Copytele, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
85
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 54 MOTION to Stay Public Version Defendant AU Optronics Corporations Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Litigation and Compel Arbitration Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Motion To Co mpel filed by Copytele, Inc., Motions terminated: 54 MOTION to Stay Public Version Defendant AU Optronics Corporations Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Litigation and Compel Arbitration Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Motion To Compel filed by Copytele, Inc.,. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 6/27/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)
1
6
Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
(efastiff@lchb.com)
David T. Rudolph (State Bar No. 233457)
(drudolph@lchb.com)
Melissa A. Gardner (State Bar No. 289096)
(mgardner@lchb.com)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc.
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
COPYTELE, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, a
Taiwanese corporation; E INK
HOLDINGS, INC., a Taiwanese
corporation; and E INK CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,
Case No. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOCKET NO.
54) AND STAYING CLAIMS PENDING
ARBITRATION
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:
June 27, 2013
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW
MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STAY LITIGATION;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
1
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2013, Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc. (“CopyTele”) filed the
2
Complaint (“Complaint”) in the above-captioned action against Defendants and AU Optronics
3
Corporation (“AUO”), a Taiwanese corporation, and E Ink Holdings, Inc., a Taiwanese
4
corporation, E Ink Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively “E Ink”);
5
6
7
8
9
10
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013, AUO filed a motion to stay litigation and compel
arbitration (Docket No. 54);
WHEREAS, CopyTele has agreed to arbitrate the claims pled in its Complaint against
AUO, and has agreed to stay the claims against AUO;
WHEREAS, CopyTele has not agreed to stay its claims against E Ink;
WHEREAS, in light of CopyTele’s agreement to arbitrate its claims against AUO and in
11
the interest of judicial economy, AUO stipulates to withdraw its motion to stay litigation and
12
compel arbitration;
13
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that:
14
1. AUO hereby withdraws its motion to compel arbitration (Docket No. 54) in light
15
of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate all claims pled in the Complaint against
16
AUO;
17
2. The claims against AUO shall be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration;
18
3. The parties shall file quarterly status reports informing the Court of the status of
19
the arbitration.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW
MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STAY LITIGATION;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
1
Dated: June 26, 2013
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN
& BERNSTEIN, LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Eric B. Fastiff
Eric B. Fastiff
Eric B. Fastiff
David T. Rudolf
Melissa Gardner
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
efastiff@lchb.com
drudolph@lchb.com
mgardner@lchb.com
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff COPYTELE, INC.
11
Dated: June 26, 2013
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
12
13
By:
/s/ Matthew Rawlinson
Matthew Rawlinson
14
15
16
17
18
Matthew Rawlinson
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
matt.rawlinson@lw.com
Attorneys for Defendant AU OPTRONICS
CORPORATION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW
MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STAY LITIGATION;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
1
2
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the
3
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
4
DATED: June 26, 2013
/s/ David T. Rudolph
David T. Rudolph
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW
MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STAY LITIGATION;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. For good cause shown:
3
1. AUO’s motion to compel arbitration (Docket No. 54) is withdrawn;
4
2. The claims against AUO shall be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration;
5
3. The parties shall file quarterly status reports informing the Court of the status of
the arbitration.
ER
14
R NIA
ard M.
dw
Judge E
Chen
FO
V
APPRO
H
13
RT
12
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District ED
Judge
NO
11
, 2013
LI
10
6/27
UNIT
ED
9
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
8
S
7
A
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW
MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STAY LITIGATION;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?