Copytele, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 97 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Copytele, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 4/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/24/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/11/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)

1

6

Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)
([e-mail])
David T. Rudolph (State Bar No. 233457)
([e-mail])
Melissa A. Gardner (State Bar No. 289096)
([e-mail])
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

COPYTELE, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,

13
Plaintiff,
14

Case No. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

v.
15
16
17

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, a
Taiwanese corporation; E INK
HOLDINGS, INC., a Taiwanese
corporation; and E INK CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,

Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:

February 20, 2014
10:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
The Honorable Edward M. Chen

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is

2

entered into by and between Plaintiff CopyTele, Inc. (“CopyTele”) and Defendants E Ink

3

Holdings, Inc., a Taiwanese corporation, E Ink Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively

4

“E Ink”), and AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”), a Taiwanese corporation.

5

WHEREAS, CopyTele filed its complaint in this action on January 28, 2013;

6

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013, AUO filed a motion to compel arbitration and to stay the

7

litigation, and E Ink filed motions to dismiss all claims against it and in the alternative to stay the

8

claims against it pending arbitration between CopyTele and AUO;
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2013, in light of CopyTele’s agreement to arbitrate its claims

9
10

against AUO, this Court stayed the claims against all defendants pending the resolution of the

11

arbitration (Dkt. No. 91);
WHEREAS, the parties engaged in Settlement Conference proceedings before Magistrate

12
13

Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in August and September but were not successful in resolving the

14

case (Dkt. Nos. 93 & 94);

15

WHEREAS, CopyTele filed its Demand for Arbitration before the American Arbitration

16

Association on September 17, 2013, and AUO filed its Answer in the arbitration on October 28,

17

2013;

18
19
20
21
22

WHEREAS, a Preliminary Hearing in the arbitration was held on February 4, 2014, and
an initial Procedural Order was issue on February 6, 2014;
WHEREAS, the Procedural Order requests that CopyTele and AUO confer on various
aspects of the discovery schedule;
WHEREAS, in light of the status of the arbitration and the ongoing status of discussions

23

regarding the scheduling of discovery, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the

24

Case Management Conference 60 days;

25
26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that:
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from February 20, 2014 to
April 24, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.
2. Pursuant to Civil General Standing Order No. 6, the Case Management
-1-

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC

1

Conference, Statement will be due on or before April 17, 2014.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC

1

Dated: February 10, 2014

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN
& BERNSTEIN, LLP

2
3
By:
4
5

/s/ Eric B. Fastiff
Eric B. Fastiff

Eric B. Fastiff
David T. Rudolf
Melissa Gardner
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff COPYTELE, INC.
11
Dated: February 10, 2014

CROWELL & MORING LLP

12
13

By:

/s/ Beatrice B. Nguyen
Beatrice B. Nguyen

14

17

Beatrice B. Nguyen
275 Battery Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

18

Attorneys for Defendant E INK CORPORATION

15
16

19
Dated: February 10, 2014

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

20
21

By:

/s/ Matthew Rawlinson
Matthew Rawlinson

22
23
24
25
26

Matthew Rawlinson
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant AU OPTRONICS
CORPORATION

27
28
-3-

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC

1
2

ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the

3

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

4

DATED: February 10, 2014

/s/ David T. Rudolph
David T. Rudolph

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. For good cause shown:
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from February 20, 2014 to

3

April 24, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.

4

2. Pursuant to Civil General Standing Order No. 6, the Case Management

5

Conference, Statement will be due on or before April 17, 2014.

7
, 2014

RT

13

dward
Judge E

NO

12

ER

15

n

M. Che

A

H

14

R NIA

11

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

10

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

UNIT
ED

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

Dated:

2/11

S

8

LI

6

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00380-EMC