Ducut v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 32

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this order to oppose defendants' motion to dismiss, file a case management statement and show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/12/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

6
7 ROCHELLE DUCUT,

Case No. 13-cv-00381 NC

8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

9

Plaintiff,
v.

10 U.S. BANK, N.A., and others,
11

Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff Rochelle Ducut seeks to quiet title on property in Antioch, California, as well

14 as injunctive and declaratory relief regarding defendants’ ability to foreclose on the
15 property. Defendants moved to dismiss all of Ducut’s claims on May 10, 2013. Ducut has
16 not responded. Ducut also failed to appear at the June 12, 2013 hearing on the motion to
17 dismiss and case management conference.
18

Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) requires parties to file and serve an opposition within fourteen

19 days after a motion is filed. In the alternative, a party who does not oppose the motion must
20 file a statement of nonopposition with the court within fourteen days. Civ. L. Rule 7-3(b).
21 “Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.” Ghazali v.
22 Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Ducut has fourteen days from the date
23 of this order to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss, to file a case management statement,
24 and to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Ducut’s failure to respond will
25 result in dismissal.
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Date: June 12, 2013

28
Case No. 13-cv-00381 NC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge