Davis v. Chappell
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Richard Allen Davis. Petitioner's motion for equitable tolling and evidence preservation due by 7/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/2/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)
1
10
RENE L. VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
Nevada Bar No. 11479
MICHAEL PESCETTA
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada Bar No. 2437
michael_pescetta@fd.org
DAVID ANTHONY
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada Bar No. 7978
david_anthony@fd.org
HEATHER FRALEY
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Texas Bar No. 24050621
heather_fraley@fd.org
411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel: (702) 388-6577
Fax: (702) 388-5819
11
Attorneys for Petitioner
12
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
RONALD S. MATTHIAS
Senior Assistant Attorney General
GLENN R. PRUDEN (No. 195089)
Glenn.Pruden@doj.ca.gov
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ALICE B. LUSTRE (No. 241994)
Alice.Lustre@doj.ca.gov
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Tel: (415) 703-5959
Fax: (415) 703-1234
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Respondent
20
21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
23
RICHARD ALLEN DAVIS,
24
25
26
Petitioner,
vs.
Case No. C-13-0408 EMC
DEATH PENALTY CASE
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
27
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, San Quentin
State Prison,
28
Respondent.
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2014, petitioner was ordered to file motions for equitable tolling
and evidence preservation within forty-five (45) days;
WHEREAS counsel for petitioner has been unable to complete said motions due to
unavoidable deadlines in other capital cases;
5
WHEREAS, the parties, having met and conferred;
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
7
Petitioner be permitted an additional thirty (30) days in which to file his motions for
8
9
10
11
12
equitable tolling and evidence preservation, to and including June 30, 2014;
Further, that petitioner will not seek additional time beyond June 30, 2014, to file said
motions.
All other provisions of the Court’s April 15, 2014 Order not inconsistent with this Stipulation
and Order shall remain in effect.
13
14
Respectfully Submitted By:
15
16
DATED: May 30, 2014.
RENE VALLADARES
Federal Public Defender
17
/s/ Michael Pescetta__________
MICHAEL PESCETTA
DAVID ANTHONY
HEATHER FRALEY
Assistant Federal Public Defenders
18
19
20
Attorneys for Petitioner
RICHARD ALLEN DAVIS
21
22
DATED: May 30, 2014.
KAMALA HARRIS
Attorney General for the State of California
23
24
/s/ Glenn R. Pruden____________
GLENN R. PRUDEN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
25
26
Attorneys for Respondent
KEVIN CHAPPELL
Warden of San Quentin State Prison
27
28
2
S
United States District Judge
dwar
Judge E
ER
H
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
FO
RT
6
en
d M. Ch
NO
5
LI
4
R NIA
ERED
O ORD
DATED: _______________, 2014. _________________________________________
IT IS S
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
6/2
A
3
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
Pursuant to LR 5-1(e)(1), I hereby certify that on this 30th day of May, 2014, I electronically filed
3
the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system: STIPULATION
4
AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE.
5
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be
6
accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
7
Ronald S. Matthias
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Second Co-counsel
8
9
Glenn R. Pruden
Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Primary/Lead Counsel
Glenn.Pruden@doj.ca.gov
10
11
Alice B. Lustre
Deputy Attorney General, First Co-counsel
Alice.Lustre@doj.ca.gov
12
13
14
/s/ Katrina Davidson
An employee of the Federal Public Defender
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?