Davis v. Chappell

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Richard Allen Davis. Petitioner's motion for equitable tolling and evidence preservation due by 7/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/2/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 10 RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 11479 MICHAEL PESCETTA Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 2437 michael_pescetta@fd.org DAVID ANTHONY Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 7978 david_anthony@fd.org HEATHER FRALEY Assistant Federal Public Defender Texas Bar No. 24050621 heather_fraley@fd.org 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 388-6577 Fax: (702) 388-5819 11 Attorneys for Petitioner 12 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California RONALD S. MATTHIAS Senior Assistant Attorney General GLENN R. PRUDEN (No. 195089) Glenn.Pruden@doj.ca.gov Supervising Deputy Attorney General ALICE B. LUSTRE (No. 241994) Alice.Lustre@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Tel: (415) 703-5959 Fax: (415) 703-1234 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Respondent 20 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 22 23 RICHARD ALLEN DAVIS, 24 25 26 Petitioner, vs. Case No. C-13-0408 EMC DEATH PENALTY CASE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 27 KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, San Quentin State Prison, 28 Respondent. 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, on April 15, 2014, petitioner was ordered to file motions for equitable tolling and evidence preservation within forty-five (45) days; WHEREAS counsel for petitioner has been unable to complete said motions due to unavoidable deadlines in other capital cases; 5 WHEREAS, the parties, having met and conferred; 6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 7 Petitioner be permitted an additional thirty (30) days in which to file his motions for 8 9 10 11 12 equitable tolling and evidence preservation, to and including June 30, 2014; Further, that petitioner will not seek additional time beyond June 30, 2014, to file said motions. All other provisions of the Court’s April 15, 2014 Order not inconsistent with this Stipulation and Order shall remain in effect. 13 14 Respectfully Submitted By: 15 16 DATED: May 30, 2014. RENE VALLADARES Federal Public Defender 17 /s/ Michael Pescetta__________ MICHAEL PESCETTA DAVID ANTHONY HEATHER FRALEY Assistant Federal Public Defenders 18 19 20 Attorneys for Petitioner RICHARD ALLEN DAVIS 21 22 DATED: May 30, 2014. KAMALA HARRIS Attorney General for the State of California 23 24 /s/ Glenn R. Pruden____________ GLENN R. PRUDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General 25 26 Attorneys for Respondent KEVIN CHAPPELL Warden of San Quentin State Prison 27 28 2 S United States District Judge dwar Judge E ER H 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 FO RT 6 en d M. Ch NO 5 LI 4 R NIA ERED O ORD DATED: _______________, 2014. _________________________________________ IT IS S HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN 6/2 A 3 UNIT ED 2 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to LR 5-1(e)(1), I hereby certify that on this 30th day of May, 2014, I electronically filed 3 the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system: STIPULATION 4 AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE. 5 I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be 6 accomplished by the CM/ECF system. 7 Ronald S. Matthias Senior Assistant Attorney General, Second Co-counsel 8 9 Glenn R. Pruden Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Primary/Lead Counsel Glenn.Pruden@doj.ca.gov 10 11 Alice B. Lustre Deputy Attorney General, First Co-counsel Alice.Lustre@doj.ca.gov 12 13 14 /s/ Katrina Davidson An employee of the Federal Public Defender 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?