Drawsand v. Cutonelli et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

PAMELA DRAWSAND,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

No. C 13-00410 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

CHRISTOPHER CUTONELLI,
CHRISTOPHER CHEN, BEVERLY
DANIELS-GREENBERG, ALAMEDA
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, ALAMEDA
COUNTY SHERIFFS’ DEPARTMENT, and
DOES 1–7,
Defendants.

16

/

17
18

By order dated February 20, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to state a

19

claim on which relief could be granted. Plaintiff was allowed to seek leave to file an amended

20

complaint by March 13. The February order specified that plaintiff must attach a proposed

21

amended complaint to the motion and should clearly explain how the proposed amendments

22

address the defects identified therein. The deadline has come and gone and no motion for leave

23

to amend has been received. Accordingly, the action is hereby DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

24

PROSECUTE.

Judgment will be entered by separate order. The CLERK shall close the file.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE