Villarreal v. Chavez

Filing 5

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO HOLD HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN ABEYANCE by Judge William Alsup [granting 4 Motion to Stay]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 ROBERT D. VILLARREAL, No. C 13-00416 WHA 13 14 15 16 17 18 Petitioner, v. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO HOLD HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN ABEYANCE FRANK X. CHAVEZ, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner Robert D. Villarreal requests that this Court hold his pending habeas corpus 19 petition in abeyance while he pursues re-sentencing under newly-enacted California law. 20 Petitioner filed a declaration stating that respondent does not oppose the request. A response to 21 the request was due by May 7, 2013, and none was received. 22 In November 2012, California Penal Code Section 1170.126 became law, permitting 23 prisoners like petitioner to seek re-sentencing. Petitioner has a hearing on his re-sentencing 24 request set for July 2013. Good cause exists here to hold the present petition in abeyance 25 because petitioner has diligently pursued his state claim for re-sentencing. Based on the 26 particular circumstances herein and the short time until petitioner’s hearing, petitioner’s request 27 is GRANTED. The habeas corpus petition will be held in abeyance until AUGUST 26, 2013. 28 1 By August 26, petitioner must file a case management statement updating the court on 2 the status of his re-sentencing. To the extent that petitioner seeks any further stay, he must file a 3 proper motion, supported by legal authority and on an adequate factual basis. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: May 17, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?