Villarreal v. Chavez
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO HOLD HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN ABEYANCE by Judge William Alsup [granting 4 Motion to Stay]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
ROBERT D. VILLARREAL,
No. C 13-00416 WHA
13
14
15
16
17
18
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST
TO HOLD HABEAS CORPUS
PETITION IN ABEYANCE
FRANK X. CHAVEZ, Warden,
Respondent.
/
Petitioner Robert D. Villarreal requests that this Court hold his pending habeas corpus
19
petition in abeyance while he pursues re-sentencing under newly-enacted California law.
20
Petitioner filed a declaration stating that respondent does not oppose the request. A response to
21
the request was due by May 7, 2013, and none was received.
22
In November 2012, California Penal Code Section 1170.126 became law, permitting
23
prisoners like petitioner to seek re-sentencing. Petitioner has a hearing on his re-sentencing
24
request set for July 2013. Good cause exists here to hold the present petition in abeyance
25
because petitioner has diligently pursued his state claim for re-sentencing. Based on the
26
particular circumstances herein and the short time until petitioner’s hearing, petitioner’s request
27
is GRANTED. The habeas corpus petition will be held in abeyance until AUGUST 26, 2013.
28
1
By August 26, petitioner must file a case management statement updating the court on
2
the status of his re-sentencing. To the extent that petitioner seeks any further stay, he must file a
3
proper motion, supported by legal authority and on an adequate factual basis.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: May 17, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?