Lodgepole Investments, LLC v. Barsky et al
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AS MODIFIED 12 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/25/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Defendants shall file their consent or declination no later than 9/18/2013 Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/23/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
1 MICHAEL J. PROCTOR, State Bar No. 148235
proctor@caldwell-leslie.com
2 ROBYN C. CROWTHER, State Bar No. 193840
crowther@caldwell-leslie.com
3 JEFFREY M. HAMMER, State Bar No. 264232
hammer@caldwell-leslie.com
4 ARMILLA STALEY-NGOMO, State Bar No. 259686
staley-ngomo@caldwell-leslie.com
5 725 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-5524
6 Telephone: (213) 629-9040
Facsimile: (213) 629-9022
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff LODGEPOLE
8 INVESTMENTS, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a
13 Nevada limited liability company,
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
16 EDWARD GENNADY BARSKY, an
individual; ST. TROPEZ CAPITAL, LLC,
17 a California limited liability company; and
MONACO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a
18 California limited liability company,
19
Case No. CV 13-00446 NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AS MODIFIED.
The Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins
Current CMC Date: August 14, 2013, at 3:00 p.m.
Proposed CMC Date: September 25, 2013, at
10:00 a.m.
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
4834-0436-5333.1
CV 13-00446 NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
Plaintiff Lodgepole Investments, LLC (“Lodgepole Investments”) and Defendant Monaco
2 Development, LLC (“Monaco”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as
3 follows:
4
WHEREAS Lodgepole Investments filed this lawsuit on January 31, 2013;
5
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case
6 Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, and scheduled the Initial Case Management
7 Conference for May 1, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.;
8
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2013, Defendants Edward Gennady Barsky and St. Tropez
9 Capital, LLC filed a Notice of Automatic Stay of this lawsuit, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and
10 based on their filing of voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy
11 Court, Central District of California;
12
WHEREAS the automatic stay has no application to the claims brought against Monaco,
13 which has not filed a bankruptcy petition;
14
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court entered an
15 Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to June 5, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., and
16 continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management
17 Conference (Dkt. No. 7);
18
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and in light of the
19 significant progress made in settlement negotiations by Lodgepole Investments and Defendants,
20 the Court entered an Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to July 10, 2013,
21 at 10:00 a.m., and continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case
22 Management Conference (Dkt. No. 9);
23
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and in light of the
24 significant progress made in settlement negotiations by Lodgepole Investments and Defendants,
25 the Court entered an Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to August 14,
26 2013, at 3:00 p.m., and continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial
27 Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 11);
28
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
4834-0436-5333.1
-1CV 13-00446 NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
WHEREAS, Lodgepole Investments and Defendants have reached a settlement in principle
2 that will fully resolve this action, and are working to finalize the written terms of such settlement;
3
NOW THEREFORE, Lodgepole Investments and Monaco hereby stipulate and agree that,
4 subject to the Court’s approval, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to
5 September 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., and that all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order
6 Setting. Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines are continued accordingly.
7
8
DATED: August 7, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
9
10
11
By
/S/
ROBYN C. CROWTHER
Attorneys for LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC
12
13
14
15
16
DATED: August 7, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
17
By
/S/
MAKSYM CHERNIAVSKYI, managing
member of MONACO DEVELOPMENT, LLC
19
Joint case management statement due September 18, 2013. Defendant shall file their consent form
20
or request reassignment NO LATER than September 18, 2013.
21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
23
August 23, 2013
25
NO
26
RT
27
thanael
Judge Na
ER
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
4834-0436-5333.1
s
A
H
28
M. Cousin
LI
24
R NIA
22
FO
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
-2CV 13-00446 NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence
3 in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatory to this document.
4
5
DATED: August 7, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
6
7
8
By
/S/
ROBYN C. CROWTHER
Attorneys for LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
4834-0436-5333.1
-3CV 13-00446 NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?