Lodgepole Investments, LLC v. Barsky et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AS MODIFIED 12 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/25/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Defendants shall file their consent or declination no later than 9/18/2013 Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/23/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)

Download PDF
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC 1 MICHAEL J. PROCTOR, State Bar No. 148235 proctor@caldwell-leslie.com 2 ROBYN C. CROWTHER, State Bar No. 193840 crowther@caldwell-leslie.com 3 JEFFREY M. HAMMER, State Bar No. 264232 hammer@caldwell-leslie.com 4 ARMILLA STALEY-NGOMO, State Bar No. 259686 staley-ngomo@caldwell-leslie.com 5 725 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-5524 6 Telephone: (213) 629-9040 Facsimile: (213) 629-9022 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff LODGEPOLE 8 INVESTMENTS, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a 13 Nevada limited liability company, 14 15 Plaintiff, v. 16 EDWARD GENNADY BARSKY, an individual; ST. TROPEZ CAPITAL, LLC, 17 a California limited liability company; and MONACO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a 18 California limited liability company, 19 Case No. CV 13-00446 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED. The Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins Current CMC Date: August 14, 2013, at 3:00 p.m. Proposed CMC Date: September 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR 4834-0436-5333.1 CV 13-00446 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiff Lodgepole Investments, LLC (“Lodgepole Investments”) and Defendant Monaco 2 Development, LLC (“Monaco”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as 3 follows: 4 WHEREAS Lodgepole Investments filed this lawsuit on January 31, 2013; 5 WHEREAS, on January 31, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case 6 Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, and scheduled the Initial Case Management 7 Conference for May 1, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.; 8 WHEREAS, on February 6, 2013, Defendants Edward Gennady Barsky and St. Tropez 9 Capital, LLC filed a Notice of Automatic Stay of this lawsuit, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) and 10 based on their filing of voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy 11 Court, Central District of California; 12 WHEREAS the automatic stay has no application to the claims brought against Monaco, 13 which has not filed a bankruptcy petition; 14 WHEREAS, on April 26, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court entered an 15 Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to June 5, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., and 16 continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management 17 Conference (Dkt. No. 7); 18 WHEREAS, on May 30, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and in light of the 19 significant progress made in settlement negotiations by Lodgepole Investments and Defendants, 20 the Court entered an Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to July 10, 2013, 21 at 10:00 a.m., and continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case 22 Management Conference (Dkt. No. 9); 23 WHEREAS, on July 8, 2013, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and in light of the 24 significant progress made in settlement negotiations by Lodgepole Investments and Defendants, 25 the Court entered an Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to August 14, 26 2013, at 3:00 p.m., and continued all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial 27 Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 11); 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR 4834-0436-5333.1 -1CV 13-00446 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 WHEREAS, Lodgepole Investments and Defendants have reached a settlement in principle 2 that will fully resolve this action, and are working to finalize the written terms of such settlement; 3 NOW THEREFORE, Lodgepole Investments and Monaco hereby stipulate and agree that, 4 subject to the Court’s approval, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to 5 September 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., and that all other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order 6 Setting. Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines are continued accordingly. 7 8 DATED: August 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted, CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC 9 10 11 By /S/ ROBYN C. CROWTHER Attorneys for LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC 12 13 14 15 16 DATED: August 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 17 By /S/ MAKSYM CHERNIAVSKYI, managing member of MONACO DEVELOPMENT, LLC 19 Joint case management statement due September 18, 2013. Defendant shall file their consent form 20 or request reassignment NO LATER than September 18, 2013. 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: S DISTRICT TE C TA The Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins United States District Court Magistrate Judge DERED SO OR IT IS DIFIED AS MO UNIT ED S RT U O 23 August 23, 2013 25 NO 26 RT 27 thanael Judge Na ER CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR 4834-0436-5333.1 s A H 28 M. Cousin LI 24 R NIA 22 FO 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C -2CV 13-00446 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence 3 in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatory to this document. 4 5 DATED: August 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted, CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC 6 7 8 By /S/ ROBYN C. CROWTHER Attorneys for LODGEPOLE INVESTMENTS, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR 4834-0436-5333.1 -3CV 13-00446 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?