Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE REGARDING JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED re 306 Order, Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 9, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
PATH, INC., et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE
REGARDING JUDICIAL REFERRAL
TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES
Re: Dkt. No. 306
On April 8, 2013, Judge Gonzalez Rogers, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), referred
Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-CV-01515-YGR, and Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., 12-CV-01529-YGR,
to this Court to consider whether those two actions, which are related to each other, are related to
the above-captioned action, Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-CV-00453.
Any party wishing to file a statement in support of or opposition to the underlying motion
to relate, Hernandez, ECF No. 52, shall file (and serve on all parties in each of the three actions)
its statement by no later than Tuesday, April 16, 2013, after which the Court will take the matter
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 9, 2013
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?