Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al

Filing 307

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE REGARDING JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED re 306 Order, Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 9, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10

PATH, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE
REGARDING JUDICIAL REFERRAL
TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES
ARE RELATED
Re: Dkt. No. 306

12
13

On April 8, 2013, Judge Gonzalez Rogers, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), referred

14

Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-CV-01515-YGR, and Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., 12-CV-01529-YGR,

15

to this Court to consider whether those two actions, which are related to each other, are related to

16

the above-captioned action, Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-CV-00453.

17

Any party wishing to file a statement in support of or opposition to the underlying motion

18

to relate, Hernandez, ECF No. 52, shall file (and serve on all parties in each of the three actions)

19

its statement by no later than Tuesday, April 16, 2013, after which the Court will take the matter

20

under submission.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 9, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge