Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al
Filing
757
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 756 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 725 MOTION for Summary Judgment Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant Twitter's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Judy Paul, Claire Hodgins, Steve Dean, Nirali Mandaywala, Guili Biondi, Jason Green, Stephanie Cooley, Gentry Hoffman, Claire Moses, Rachelle King, Alan Beueshasen, Greg Varner. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2016)
1 David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375)
Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No. 112532)
2 Conor H. Kennedy (State Bar No. 281793)
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
3 39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
4 Tel: 415-398-0900
Fax: 415-398-0911
5 Email: dmg@phillaw.com
nac@phillaw.com
6
chk@phillaw.com
7
James M. Wagstaffe (State Bar No. 95535)
8 Michael J. von Loewenfeldt (State Bar No. 178665)
Frank Busch (State Bar No. 258228)
9 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
100 Spear Street, 18th Floor
10 San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415-371-8500
11 Fax: 415-371-0500
Email: wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com
12
mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com
busch@kerrwagstaffe.com
13
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19 MARK OPPERMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
v.
22 PATH, INC., et al.,
23
24
25
26
27
Defendants.
Case No: 13-cv-00453-JST
CLASS ACTION
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO
CASES:
Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST
Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST
Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
1
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”)
2
(collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue Plaintiffs’
3
deadline to file and serve their Opposition to Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment as well
4
as Twitter’s Reply deadline and this Court’s hearing on the Motion.
5
6
The Parties hereby stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Twitter’s Motion (ECF
No. 725) as follows:
7
EVENT
DEADLINE
8
Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief
August 11, 2016
9
Twitter’s Reply Brief
September 8, 2016
Hearing on Motion
September 22, 2016
10
11
The reason for the Parties’ request is that they are engaged in discovery-related
12
conversations that Plaintiffs contend are relevant to Twitter’s pending Motion for Summary
13
Judgment.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: July 5, 2016
/s/ Conor H. Kennedy
David M. Given
Nicholas A Carlin
Conor H. Kennedy
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: (415) 398-0900
Fax: (415) 398-0911
Michael von Loewenfeldt
James M. Wagstaffe
Frank Busch
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415) 371-8500
Fax: (415) 371-0500
26
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
27
28
(Additional counsel listed on following page.)
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
4
Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: (512) 480-8427
Fax: (512) 857-1294
5
Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel
1
2
3
6
Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARDS LAW
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: (512) 623-7727
Fax: (512) 623-7729
7
8
9
10
Jennifer Sarnelli (SBN 242510)
GARDY & NOTIS, LLP
Tower 56
126 E. 56th Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 905-0509
Fax: (212) 905-0508
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: July 5, 2016
/s/ James G. Snell
James G. Snell
Julie E. Schwartz
Lauren B. Cohen
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: (650) 838-4300
Fax: (650) 838-4350
Ryan T. Mrazik
John R. Tyler
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Ave, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: (206) 359-8000
Fax: (206) 359-9000
27
28
Counsel for Defendant Twitter, Inc.
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
1
2
ATTESTATION
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other
3
signatories listed above.
4
Dated: July 5, 2016
5
/s/ Conor H. Kennedy
Conor H. Kennedy
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants Twitter, Inc. regarding timing of
3
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
4
GRANTED, to be scheduled as follows:
5
EVENT
DEADLINE
6
Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief
August 11, 2016
7
Twitter’s Reply Brief
September 8, 2016
8
Hearing on Motion
September 22, 2016
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
July 7
DATED: __________________, 2016
12
13
14
By: __________________________
Hon. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify that on this day, July 5, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing document,
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS
4
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, to
5
be served on all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system.
6
Dated: July 5, 2016
7
/s/ Conor H. Kennedy
Conor H. Kennedy
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?