Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al

Filing 757

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 756 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 725 MOTION for Summary Judgment Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant Twitter's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Judy Paul, Claire Hodgins, Steve Dean, Nirali Mandaywala, Guili Biondi, Jason Green, Stephanie Cooley, Gentry Hoffman, Claire Moses, Rachelle King, Alan Beueshasen, Greg Varner. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375) Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No. 112532) 2 Conor H. Kennedy (State Bar No. 281793) PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP 3 39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 San Francisco, CA 94129 4 Tel: 415-398-0900 Fax: 415-398-0911 5 Email: dmg@phillaw.com nac@phillaw.com 6 chk@phillaw.com 7 James M. Wagstaffe (State Bar No. 95535) 8 Michael J. von Loewenfeldt (State Bar No. 178665) Frank Busch (State Bar No. 258228) 9 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, 18th Floor 10 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415-371-8500 11 Fax: 415-371-0500 Email: wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com 12 mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com busch@kerrwagstaffe.com 13 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 MARK OPPERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 20 21 v. 22 PATH, INC., et al., 23 24 25 26 27 Defendants. Case No: 13-cv-00453-JST CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES: Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 1 Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) 2 (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue Plaintiffs’ 3 deadline to file and serve their Opposition to Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment as well 4 as Twitter’s Reply deadline and this Court’s hearing on the Motion. 5 6 The Parties hereby stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Twitter’s Motion (ECF No. 725) as follows: 7 EVENT DEADLINE 8 Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief August 11, 2016 9 Twitter’s Reply Brief September 8, 2016 Hearing on Motion September 22, 2016 10 11 The reason for the Parties’ request is that they are engaged in discovery-related 12 conversations that Plaintiffs contend are relevant to Twitter’s pending Motion for Summary 13 Judgment. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy David M. Given Nicholas A Carlin Conor H. Kennedy PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP 39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 San Francisco, CA 94129 Tel: (415) 398-0900 Fax: (415) 398-0911 Michael von Loewenfeldt James M. Wagstaffe Frank Busch KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 101 Mission Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 26 Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 27 28 (Additional counsel listed on following page.) 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 4 Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice) LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER 1101 East 11th Street Austin, TX 78702 Tel: (512) 480-8427 Fax: (512) 857-1294 5 Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel 1 2 3 6 Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice) EDWARDS LAW 1101 East 11th Street Austin, TX 78702 Tel: (512) 623-7727 Fax: (512) 623-7729 7 8 9 10 Jennifer Sarnelli (SBN 242510) GARDY & NOTIS, LLP Tower 56 126 E. 56th Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 905-0509 Fax: (212) 905-0508 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ James G. Snell James G. Snell Julie E. Schwartz Lauren B. Cohen PERKINS COIE LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: (650) 838-4300 Fax: (650) 838-4350 Ryan T. Mrazik John R. Tyler PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Ave, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: (206) 359-8000 Fax: (206) 359-9000 27 28 Counsel for Defendant Twitter, Inc. 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 1 2 ATTESTATION I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 3 signatories listed above. 4 Dated: July 5, 2016 5 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy Conor H. Kennedy 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 The stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants Twitter, Inc. regarding timing of 3 Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 4 GRANTED, to be scheduled as follows: 5 EVENT DEADLINE 6 Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief August 11, 2016 7 Twitter’s Reply Brief September 8, 2016 8 Hearing on Motion September 22, 2016 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 July 7 DATED: __________________, 2016 12 13 14 By: __________________________ Hon. JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that on this day, July 5, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing document, 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS 4 TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, to 5 be served on all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system. 6 Dated: July 5, 2016 7 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy Conor H. Kennedy 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?