Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al

Filing 840

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 838 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
Stacy Hovan (Bar No. 271485)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: + 1 [phone]
Facsimile: + 1 [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

7
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.

16
PATH, INC., et al.,
17
18

Defendants.

19
20

Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
Date:
Time:
Judge:

November 3, 2016
2:00 p.m.
Honorable Jon S. Tigar

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES:

21

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST
Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST
Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SILI CON VA LL EY

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Plaintiffs, through

2

their respective counsel, have stipulated to request an Order extending the deadline for Apple to

3

file its Reply brief in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by one week, from

4

September 26, 2016 to October 3, 2016, based on the following recitals.

5
6
7
8
9

WHEREAS on April 22, 2016, Apple filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Regarding the Path App (ECF No. 694);
WHEREAS on August 29, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Apple’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 818);
WHEREAS unredacted copies of certain materials designated as confidential by another

10

defendant, which were conditionally filed under seal, were not served on Apple until several days

11

after the opposition was filed;

12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS the hearing on Apple’s summary judgment motion is currently set for
November 3, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.;
WHEREAS Apple desires one additional week to prepare its reply, and Plaintiffs are
agreeable to that request, and the parties have agreed to the requested extension of time;
THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Apple and Plaintiffs that,

17

subject to Court approval, Apple may have an extension of seven (7) days to file its reply in

18

support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

19
20

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 19, 2016

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

21
By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk
Stacy Hovan
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Ave., Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

22
23
24
25

Clayton C. James
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SILI CON VA LL EY

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2

1

[e-mail]

2

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
APPLE INC.

3
4
5

Dated: September 19, 2016

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt
James M. Wagstaffe (95535)
Michael von Loewenfeldt (178665)
Daniel J. Veroff (291492)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

David M. Given
Nicholas A. Carlin
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Ste. 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

17

Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER
The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel
22

Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARDS LAW
The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

23
24
25
26

Jennifer Sarnelli
GARDY & NOTIS, LLP
501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408
New York, NY 10017

27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SILI CON VA LL EY

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2

1
2

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

3

ATTORNEYS FOR OPPERMAN PLAINTIFFS

4
5
6

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other
signatories listed above.
Dated: September 19, 2016

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

7
By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SILI CON VA LL EY

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the stipulation is

3

hereby granted in this matter. Defendant Apple Inc. shall file its reply in support of its Motion for

4

Partial Summary Judgment on or before October 3, 2016.

5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7

Dated: September 19, 2016

8

____________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SILI CON VA LL EY

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2