Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al

Filing 869

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 868 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 22, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
Clayton C. James (Bar No. 287800)
Stacy Hovan (Bar No. 271485)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: + 1 [phone]
Facsimile: + 1 [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.

15
PATH, INC., et al.,
16

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS FOR OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFS REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

17
18

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS:

19

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST
Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST
Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST
Gutierrez v. Instagram, Inc., No. 12-cv-6550-JST

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 13-CV-00453-JST

1
2
3

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), Plaintiffs in this proceeding and Defendant Apple Inc.
(collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

Apple believes that its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification requires

4

discussion of a number of legal and factual issues that cannot be addressed within the Local Rules

5

default page limits;

6
7

2.

Counsel for the Parties have met and conferred and have come to an agreement, subject

to the approval of the Court, regarding page limits for briefing on class certification;

8

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

9



10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Apple’s Opposition to the class certification motion shall not exceed thirty (35) pages in
length;



Apple will not oppose a request from Plaintiffs for an additional ten (10) pages for their
reply brief should they determine that they need additional pages.

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: March 22, 2017

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt
James M. Wagstaffe
Michael von Loewenfeldt
Frank Busch
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
David M. Given
Nicholas A. Carlin
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 13-CV-00453-JST

The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

5

Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARDS LAW
The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9

Jennifer Sarnelli
GARDY & NOTIS, LLP
Tower 56
126 East 56th street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022
501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408
New York, NY 10017
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Dated: March 22, 2017

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk
Stacy Hovan
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Ave., Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

26

Clayton C. James
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80202
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

27

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC.

23
24
25

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 13-CV-00453-JST

FILER’S ATTESTATION

1
2

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other

3

signatories listed above.

4

Dated: March 22, 2017

5
6

Hogan Lovells US LLP
By:

/s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 13-CV-00453-JST

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS

3
4
5

HEREBY ORDERED:
Defendant Apple Inc.’s Opposition to the class certification motion shall not exceed
thirty-five (35) pages in length.

6
7
8
9
10

Dated: March 22, 2017
____________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 13-CV-00453-JST