Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al

Filing 887

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 886 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Page Limits for Reply brief Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification filed by Lauren Carter, Judy Paul, Claire Hodgins, Steve Dean, Nirali Mandaywala, Guili Biondi, Jason Green, Stephanie Cooley, Gentry Hoffman, Claire Moses, Rachelle King, Alan Beueshasen, Greg Varner. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 25, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

DAVID M. GIVEN (SBN 142375)
NICHOLAS A CARLIN (SBN 112532)
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (SBN 178665)
JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (SBN 95535)
FRANK BUSCH (SBN 258288)
DANIEL J. VEROFF (SBN 291492)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
[Additional counsel included on signature page]

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23

v.
PATH, INC., et al.
Defendants.

24
25

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY
BRIEF REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES
Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST
Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST
Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST
Espitia v. Hipster, Inc., No. 13-cv-0432-JST
(collectively, the “Related Actions”)

26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS

1
2
3

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), Plaintiffs in this proceeding and Defendant Apple
Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

The Parties previously stipulated to an order, which this Court issued at ECF No.

4

869, that due to the number of legal and factual issues on this motion, Apple shall have an

5

additional ten (10) pages for its Opposition over and above what the Local Rules allow, for a

6

total of thirty-five (35) pages;

7
8
9

2.

In that same stipulation, Apple agreed that it would not oppose a request from

Plaintiffs for an additional ten (10) pages for their Reply brief;
3.

After reviewing Apple’s Opposition, Plaintiffs believe that their Reply in support

10

of their motion for class certification requires discussion of a number of legal and factual issues

11

that cannot be addressed within the Local Rules default page limits;

12
13

4.

Counsel for the Parties have met and conferred and agree that an additional ten

(10) pages for Plaintiffs’ Reply is appropriate.

14

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

15

Plaintiffs shall have twenty-five (25) pages for their Reply brief.

16
17

Dated: April 25, 2017

18

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt
James M. Wagstaffe (95535)
Michael von Loewenfeldt (178665)
Frank Busch (258288)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24

David M. Given
Nicholas A. Carlin
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Ste. 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
Tel: [phone]

25
26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

2
Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS

1

Fax: [phone]
[e-mail] [e-mail]

2

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

3
Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER
The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel
9
Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARDS LAW
The Haehnel Building
1101 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78702
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

17

Jennifer Sarnelli
GARDY & NOTIS, LLP
126 E. 56th Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

18

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

15
16

19

Dated: April 25, 2017

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

20
By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk
Robert B. Hawk
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Ave., Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25

Clayton C. James
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80202

26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

3
Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

1
2
3

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT APPLE
INC

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

4
Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
Plaintiffs’ Reply in support of its class certification motion shall not exceed a total of twenty-

4
5

five (25) pages in length

6

Dated:

April 25, 2017
____________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

5
Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other

3

signatories listed above.

4

Dated: April 25, 2017

By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt
Michael von Loewenfeldt

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W

K E R R
––––– & –––––

A G S T A F F E
LL P

6
Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING PAGE LIMITS