Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 104

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 103 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT CMI USA, INC.S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF (1) INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 8,240,362 AND 8,245,764; AND (2) NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,240,362 filed by CMI USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)
Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1950 University Circle, 5th Floor
E. Palo Alto, CA 94303-2282
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
[e-mail]
Holly Atkinson (SBN 286546)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Celine Liu (SBN 268990)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1404
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-239-3333
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC.
and ASETEK A/S

Attorneys for Defendant
CMI USA, INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and
ASETEK A/S,
Plaintiffs,

17
18

vs.

20

COOLER MASTER CO., LTD. and
CMI USA INC., fka COOLER MASTER
USA, INC.

21

Defendants.

19

22

Case No: 3:13-cv-00457 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT
CMI USA, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OF (1) INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NOS.
8,240,362 AND 8,245,764; AND (2) NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.
8,240,362
DATE:
TIME:
JUDGE:
DEPT:

October 15, 2014
2:00 PM
Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom 9, 19th Floor

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE CMI USA’S REPLY ISO MOT. FOR SUMM. J. OF
INVALIDITY & OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Case No. 3:13-CV-00457 JST

1

Pursuant to the Court’s August 27, 2014 Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 76), Defendant CMI

2

USA filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 86) on September 5, 2014. Plaintiff Asetek

3

filed its opposition on September 19, 2014. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3, CMI’s opposition is due on

4

September 26, 2014. Hearing on the motion is scheduled to take place on October 15, 2014.

5

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a) and 7-12, the parties, through their respective counsel of record,

6

hereby stipulate, with the Court’s permission, to extend the time for CMI to file its reply brief by one

7

court day, from Friday, September 26, 2014 to Monday, September 29, 2014. No change to the

8

scheduled hearing date is requested or necessary in light of this requested extension, and the Court

9

would still have more than two weeks to consider full briefing before the hearing on October 15,

10
11
12

2014.
By the signature below, counsel for Defendant CMI attests that counsel for Plaintiff Asetek
concur in the filing of this document.

13
14

Dated: September 25, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

15
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
16
By:

17
18

/s/ Elizabeth H. Rader
Elizabeth H. Rader
Attorneys for Defendant CMI USA, Inc.

19
20
Dated: September 25, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

21
22

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

23
24
25
26

By:

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Asetek A/S
and Asetek Holdings, Inc.

27
28

1
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE CMI USA’S REPLY ISO MOT. FOR SUMM. J. OF
INVALIDITY & OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Case No. 3:13-CV-00457 JST

1
2
3

Filer’s Attestation
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury
that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert F. McCauley.

4
5

Alston & Bird LLP

6

/s/ Elizabeth H. Rader
Elizabeth H. Rader

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE CMI USA’S REPLY ISO MOT. FOR SUMM. J. OF
INVALIDITY & OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Case No. 3:13-CV-00457 JST

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

UNIT
ED

September 26, 2014
Dated: ___________________

8

R NIA

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
_________________________________

6
7

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

United States District Judge

NO

9

RT

ER

H

10

nS
J u d ge J o

11

. Ti ga r

FO

4

USA will have until September 29, 2014 to file its reply motion for summary judgment brief.

LI

3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED. CMI

A

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE CMI USA’S REPLY ISO MOT. FOR SUMM. J. OF
INVALIDITY & OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Case No. 3:13-CV-00457 JST