Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 128

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 127 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulated Request to Continue Filing Date of Motions in limine by One Day filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
[e-mail]
Holly Atkinson (SBN 286546)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ASETEK DANMARK A/S

9

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)
Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1950 University Circle, 5th Floor
E. Palo Alto, CA 94303-2282
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Celine Liu (SBN 268990)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1404
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-239-3333
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
CMI USA, INC.

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

17
18
19

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST

Plaintiff,
v.
CMI USA, INC. fka COOLER MASTER USA,
INC.,

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO
CONTINUE FILING DATE OF
MOTIONS IN LIMINE BY ONE DAY;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

Counsel for Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendant CMI USA, Inc. (“CMI

2

USA”) respectfully stipulate and request, with the Court’s permission, that the due date for motions

3

in limine be continued by one day from November 4, 2014 to November 5, 2014, and that the due

4

date for oppositions be moved from November 10, to November 11, 2014 (in advance of the pretrial

5

conference on November 14, 2014).

6

The Court indicated a willingness to modify the schedule for filing in limine motions at the

7

recent hearing on CMI USA’s motion for summary judgment, and because parties are busily

8

engaged in pretrial discussions and work related to the trial exhibit list, pretrial statement, and other

9

matters, and are continuing to negotiate potential motions in limine, the parties believe that each

10

would benefit by the requested extension and that the number of motions in limine may be reduced

11

as a result.

12
13
14

By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiff attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the
filing of this document.

15
16

Dated: November 3, 2014

Respectfully submitted,
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

17
18
19

By:

/s/ Robert McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.

21
22
23

Dated: November 3, 2014

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

24
25

By:

/s/ Elizabeth Rader
Elizabeth H. Rader

26

Attorneys for Defendant
CMI USA, Inc.

27
28
1

STIPULATION
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRIC
E
T

S

UNIT
ED

4

T
TA

Dated: November __, 2014
3

C

RT
U
O

3

________________________________

DERED
ORTigar
The Honorable O S.
IT IS S Jon

5
6

United States District Judge
Northern District of California

7

NO

R NIA

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

ER

10

FO

A

H

9

Ti ga r

LI

RT

8

n S.
J u d ge J o

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST