Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 317

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FORM OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION re 313 Objection, filed by CMI USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 18, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2015)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Case No. 13-cv-00457-JST

Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8

CMI USA, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FORM
OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Re: ECF No. 313

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

The Court has received Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s Objections to Asetek Danmark A/S’s
Proposed Form of Permanent Injunction. ECF No. 313.
Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) filed a motion for entry of a permanent

13

injunction, which also included a suggested form of the injunction. See ECF No. 266. CMI’s

14

opposition addressed the merits of the motion but did not discuss objections to the form of

15

Asetek’s proposed injunction. See ECF No. 287. At the hearing, CMI asked the Court for an

16

opportunity to provide objections as to the form. ECF No. 316, Tr. 39:1-9. After noting that CMI

17

could have addressed this issue in its briefing, the Court instructed CMI to submit a request to file

18

an objection that included information as to the suggested form of the request, the proposed

19

timeline, and the number of pages required. Id. 39:10-24. Rather than file a request to object,

20

CMI instead filed its objections. ECF No. 313.

21

The Court will consider CMI’s objections. The Court, however, admonishes the parties

22

not to violate future Court orders. Asetek is ordered to file its response to CMI’s objections, if

23

any, by August 25, 2015. No reply by CMI will be permitted.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 18, 2015

26
27
28

______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge