Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 319

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 309 MOTION for Review of Taxation of Costs DEFENDANT CMI USA, INC.S MOTION TO REVIEW CLERKS DECISION NOT TO TAX COSTS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(b)(4)(E) filed by CMI USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 24, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ASETEK DANMARK A/S, Case No. 13-cv-00457-JST Plaintiff, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 CMI USA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 309 Defendant. 8 9 Before the Court is Defendant's motion to review the Clerk’s decision not to tax costs. ECF No. 309. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, 12 currently scheduled for September 3, 2015, is hereby VACATED. 13 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 14 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 15 been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 16 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 17 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 18 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 19 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2015 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?