Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
382
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 380 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 24, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Erik R. Puknys (SBN 190926)
erik.puknys@finnegan.com
Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717)
jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
8
9
10
11
12
Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)
arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Two Seaport Lane, 6th Floor
Boston, MA 02210-2001
Telephone:
(617) 646-1600
Facsimile:
(617) 646-1666
Reuben H. Chen (SBN 228725)
rchen@cooley.com
Kyle D. Chen (SBN 239501)
kyle.chen@cooley.com
COOLEY LLP
3175 Hanover St
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: (650) 843-5000
Fax: (650) 849-7400
Attorneys for Defendant
CMI USA, INC.
Kyle D. Chen (SBN 239501)
kyle.chen@cooley.com
COOLEY LLP
3175 Hanover St
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: (650) 843-5000
Fax: (650) 849-7400
Attorneys for Intervenor
COOLER MASTER CO., LTD.
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
ASETEK DANMARK A/S,
Plaintiff,
20
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
v.
22
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-00457-JST
CMI USA, INC., fka COOLER
MASTER USA, INC.
23
Defendant,
24
and
25
COOLER MASTER CO., LTD
26
Intervenor.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00457-JST
1
Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendant CMI USA, Inc. (“CMI”)
2
(collectively the “Parties”) respectfully submit this joint stipulation. On October 19, 2015, the Court
3
entered its Amended Judgment against CMI and in favor of Asetek in the amount of $639,457.18.
4
DI 339. CMI appealed to the Federal Circuit. Pending its appeal, CMI submitted evidence of a
5
supersedeas bond in the amount of $607,500 (DI 347), as well as a supplemental cash deposit to the
6
Court in the amount of $37,000 which the parties agreed to treat as part of its supersedeas bond (see
7
DI 347-1, DI 347-2), and the Court stayed the execution of judgment. DI 347-2.
8
On April 3, 2017, the United States Court of the Federal Circuit issued its opinion and
9
judgment affirming this Court’s rulings on damages, validity, and infringement. DI 375, DI 376. A
10
11
mandate has been issued and filed. DI 377, DI 378.
The Parties jointly request that the Court issue an order lifting the stay on execution of
12
judgment. The Parties stipulate that in addition to the $639,457.18 due to Asetek under the
13
judgment (DI 337), post-judgment interest of $2,178 is due from CMI to Asetek, so that CMI is
14
obligated to pay $641,635.18 to satisfy judgment.
15
Counsel for the parties are cooperating and expect Asetek to also receive CMI’s payment of
16
$607,500 under the bond (DI 347) because CMI has represented that it deposited the full $607,500
17
with a bonding company, and collection efforts are underway. D.I. 347, Ex. 1. With regard to the
18
balance of $34,135.18 owed to Asetek, the Parties stipulate and jointly request that the Court issue
19
an order directing the Court Clerk issue a check in that amount to Asetek Danmark A/S (drawn from
20
CMI’s $37,000 deposit with the Court) and mail it to Robert McCauley (counsel for Asetek), and
21
that the Court issue a check to CMI USA, Inc. for the balance, $2,864.82, and mail it to Kyle Chen
22
(counsel for CMI).
23
This stipulation is submitted without prejudice to any further execution or collection efforts
24
by Asetek in the event the bonding company does not pay Asetek within 30 days from entry of this
25
stipulated order or for other good cause.
26
27
28
ATTESTATION
By signature below, counsel for Asetek attests that counsel for CMI concurs in the filing of
this document.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00457-JST
1
2
Dated: April 19, 2017
Respectfully submitted
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3
4
By:
5
6
7
Dated: April 19, 2017
/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Asetek Danmark A/S
COOLEY LLP
8
9
10
11
By:
/s/ Kyle D. Chen
Kyle D. Chen
Attorneys for Defendants
Cooler Master Co., Ltd., CMI
USA, Inc., fka Cooler Master USA Inc.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00457-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED
THAT:
The stay on execution of judgment for Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and against
Defendant CMI USA, Inc. (“CMI”) is lifted. The Clerk of the Court shall:
1. Issue a check for $34,135.18 made payable to Asetek Danmark A/S (drawn from
7
CMI’s $37,000 prior deposit with the Court (see DI 347-1) and mail it to Robert
8
McCauley, Finnegan, 3300 Hillview Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304; and
9
2. Issue a check to payable to CMI USA, Inc. for 2,864.82 (the balance on CMI’s
10
$37,000 prior deposit) and mail it to Kyle Chen, Cooley, 3175 Hanover St., Palo
11
Alto, CA 94304.
12
This Order is entered without prejudice to any further execution or collection efforts by
13
Asetek on the $607,500 owed by CMI in the event the bonding company does not pay Asetek within
14
30 days from entry of this order or for other good cause.
18
O
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
ar
RT
20
NO
19
O
IT IS S
J u d ge J o
21
22
A
H
ER
n S . Ti g
R NIA
D
__________________________
RDERE
FO
April 24, 2017
Dated: _________________
LI
17
UNIT
ED
16
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
15
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00457-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?