Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 93 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 92 MOTION to Exclude Testimony Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc.'s and Asetek A/S's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendant CMI USA, Inc.'s Expert Gregory P. Carman filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 11, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) robert.mccauley@finnegan.com Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665) jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com Holly Atkinson (SBN 286546) holly.atkinson@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Tel: (650) 849-6600 Fax: (650) 849-6666 Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) Alston & Bird LLP 1950 University Circle, 5th Floor E. Palo Alto, CA 94303-2282 Telephone: 650-838-2000 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S Attorneys for Defendants CMI USA, INC. Celine Liu (SBN 268990) Alston & Bird LLP 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1404 Telephone: 202-239-3300 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S, 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. CMI USA, INC. fka COOLER MASTER USA, INC., CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. GREGORY P. CARMAN; 18 Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST 1 On September 10, 2014, Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) filed a 2 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendant’s Expert Gregory P. Carman. Dkt. 92 Asetek noticed 3 the hearing for the motion for Thursday, October 16, 2014, the Court’s day for civil law and motion 4 hearings. The Court previously set the dispositive motion hearing on October 15, 2014. Dkt. 76. 5 To minimize the burden on the parties and the Court, the parties have agreed and jointly request that 6 the hearing on Asetek’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s Expert 7 Gregory P. Carman be advanced by one day, so that the motion is heard on Wednesday, October 15, 8 2014, at the same time as the hearing for dispositive motions. This proposed change will not impact 9 any other deadlines in this case and the hearing on Asetek’s motion would be conducted thirty-five 10 days after the filing of the motion. 11 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant jointly submit 12 this stipulated request for an order changing time, requesting that the Court order that the hearing on 13 Asetek’s Motion to Exclude be advanced by one day, moving the hearing from October 16, 2014, to 14 October 15, 2014. 15 16 By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the filing of this document. 17 18 Dated: September 10, 2014 19 Respectfully submitted, FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 20 21 By: 22 23 24 Dated: September 10, 2014 /s/ Jeffrey D. Smyth Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665) Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S ALSTON & BIRD, LLP 25 26 27 By: /s/ Elizabeth H. Rader Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) Attorneys for Defendants CMI USA, Inc. 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 7 ER Ti ga r LI n S. J u d ge J o A H 10 RT 9 NO 8 R NIA 6 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar ERED O ORD United States District Judge IT IS S Northern District of California FO 5 Dated: September 11, 2014 RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA ________________________________________ UNIT ED 3 N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00457-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?