L. et al v. Oakland Unified School District

Filing 38

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SURREPLY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/31/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

N.L., through her parent Y. RUTHERFORD
Plainitff,

13
14
15

v.

No. C 13-0488 RS
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
FILE SURREPLY

OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,

16

Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_________________________________
Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), “[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional
memoranda, papers or letter may be filed without prior Court approval.” Defendant Oakland
Unified School District filed a letter with the court requesting the opportunity to file a surreply to
plaintiff’s reply brief, because defendant “believes Plaintiff has regularly misstated and
misrepresented the holdings of the authorities cited therein.” Dkt. 34. Plaintiff, properly construing
defendant’s letter as a motion for administrative relief under Civil Local Rule 7-11, filed an
opposition as permitted by that rule. See Dkt. 35. The request to file a surreply is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 7/31/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE