F.G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns et al v. Tim Kruse Construction, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 28 MOTION to Continue. Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)
Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page1 of 4
1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607)
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com
5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 F. G. CROSTHWAITE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
v.
12 TIM KRUSE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
California Corporation,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Case No.: C13-0496 JSW
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Date: Friday, January 10, 2014
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Ctrm: 11, 19th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California
Judge: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
16
17
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference scheduled for
18 January 10, 2014, at 1:30 p.m., be continued for approximately ninety (90) days, as follows:
19
1.
As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on February 5, 2013 to
20 compel Defendant to comply with the terms of its Collective Bargaining Agreement.
21
2.
Plaintiffs served the complaint, summons, and court documents on Defendant on
22 February 22, 2013. Defendant failed to answer by the March 15, 2013 deadline, and Plaintiffs
23 requested Entry of Default, which was entered by the court on March 29, 2013. Thereafter,
24 discussion between the parties began.
25
3.
Defendant asked for time to review its records regarding amounts due to Plaintiffs.
26 Plaintiffs requested a continuance of the Case Management Conference on May 3, 2013 (Dkt. No.
27 16) to allow that time, and the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order continuing the
28 Case Management Conference to August 9, 2013 (Dkt. No. 17).
-1REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C13-00496 JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx
Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page2 of 4
4.
1
Plaintiffs requested an additional continuance of the Case Management Conference
2 on August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 19), and the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order
3 continuing the Case Management Conference to October 11, 2013 (Dkt. No. 20).
5.
4
Plaintiffs’ counsel again attempted to contact Defendant before incurring further
5 expense in continuing legal action and in an attempt to resolve this matter. Defendant was out of
6 the office, so Plaintiffs left a message for Defendant requesting contact. In hopes of reaching a
7 resolution with Defendant, Plaintiffs requested another continuance of the Case Management
8 Conference on October 4, 2013 (Dkt. No. 22). The Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an
9 order continuing the Case Management Conference to November 15, 2013 (Dkt. No. 23).
6.
10
Defendant contacted Plaintiffs’ counsel, requested a payment plan for amounts due
11 to Plaintiffs, and submitted all the documentation necessary for preparation of the same. Plaintiffs
12 requested another continuance of the Case Management Conference on November 7, 2013 (Dkt.
13 No. 25), to allow for sufficient time to draft and file a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation. The Court
14 granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order continuing the Case Management Conference to
15 January 10, 2013 (Dkt. No. 26).
7.
16
Plaintiffs prepared a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation and sent it to Defendant for
17 execution on November 8, 2013, but Defendant has failed to sign the Stipulation. Plaintiffs will
18 now prepare a Motion for Default Judgment and therefore request another continuance of the Case
19 Management Conference.
8.
20
There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently
21 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s
22 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled
23 Case Management Conference for approximately ninety (90) days, in order to allow for sufficient
24 time for Plaintiffs to prepare and file a Motion for Default Judgment.
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
-2REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C13-00496 JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx
Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page3 of 4
1
9.
Plaintiffs recognize that a case management conference statement is due seven days
2 in advance of the case management conference date and that the statement must include all
3 elements requested in the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California –
4 Contents of Joint Case Management Statement” pursuant to Local Rule 16-9. Should this Court
5 require Plaintiffs to file a Case Management Conference Statement, Plaintiffs will do so promptly.
6 Dated: January 2, 2014
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
7
By:
8
9
/S/
Michele R. Stafford
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case
Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________, and all related deadlines are
February 21, 2014
13 extended accordingly. The case management conference will be vacated if Plaintiffs file their motion
for default judgment by February 14, 2014.
14
January 3, 2014
Date: ____________________
_________________________________________
15
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
12
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C13-00496 JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx
Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page4 of 4
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2 I, the undersigned, declare:
3
1.
I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San
4 Francisco, State of California. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, San
5 Francisco, California 94104.
6
2.
I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action.
7
3.
On January 2, 2014, I served the following document(s):
8
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
9
CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
10 on the interested parties in said action by enclosing a true and exact copy of each document in a
11 sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and First Class mailing following our
12 ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and
13 processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for
14 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States
15 Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
16
17
18
19
4.
The envelopes were addressed and mailed as follows:
Tim Kruse Construction, Inc.
c/o Tim Kruse
Agent for Service of Process
2824 Roven Ct.
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Tim Kruse Construction, Inc.
550 Drever St.
West Sacramento, CA 95691
20
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
21
declaration was executed on January 2, 2014, at San Francisco, California.
22
/S/
23
Alicia Rutkowski
Paralegal
24
25
26
27
28
-4REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C13-00496 JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?