F.G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns et al v. Tim Kruse Construction, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 28 MOTION to Continue. Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page1 of 4 1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 F. G. CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 11 v. 12 TIM KRUSE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Case No.: C13-0496 JSW PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Date: Friday, January 10, 2014 Time: 1:30 p.m. Ctrm: 11, 19th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California Judge: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 16 17 Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference scheduled for 18 January 10, 2014, at 1:30 p.m., be continued for approximately ninety (90) days, as follows: 19 1. As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on February 5, 2013 to 20 compel Defendant to comply with the terms of its Collective Bargaining Agreement. 21 2. Plaintiffs served the complaint, summons, and court documents on Defendant on 22 February 22, 2013. Defendant failed to answer by the March 15, 2013 deadline, and Plaintiffs 23 requested Entry of Default, which was entered by the court on March 29, 2013. Thereafter, 24 discussion between the parties began. 25 3. Defendant asked for time to review its records regarding amounts due to Plaintiffs. 26 Plaintiffs requested a continuance of the Case Management Conference on May 3, 2013 (Dkt. No. 27 16) to allow that time, and the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order continuing the 28 Case Management Conference to August 9, 2013 (Dkt. No. 17). -1REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-00496 JSW P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page2 of 4 4. 1 Plaintiffs requested an additional continuance of the Case Management Conference 2 on August 2, 2013 (Dkt. No. 19), and the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order 3 continuing the Case Management Conference to October 11, 2013 (Dkt. No. 20). 5. 4 Plaintiffs’ counsel again attempted to contact Defendant before incurring further 5 expense in continuing legal action and in an attempt to resolve this matter. Defendant was out of 6 the office, so Plaintiffs left a message for Defendant requesting contact. In hopes of reaching a 7 resolution with Defendant, Plaintiffs requested another continuance of the Case Management 8 Conference on October 4, 2013 (Dkt. No. 22). The Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an 9 order continuing the Case Management Conference to November 15, 2013 (Dkt. No. 23). 6. 10 Defendant contacted Plaintiffs’ counsel, requested a payment plan for amounts due 11 to Plaintiffs, and submitted all the documentation necessary for preparation of the same. Plaintiffs 12 requested another continuance of the Case Management Conference on November 7, 2013 (Dkt. 13 No. 25), to allow for sufficient time to draft and file a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation. The Court 14 granted Plaintiffs’ request and issued an order continuing the Case Management Conference to 15 January 10, 2013 (Dkt. No. 26). 7. 16 Plaintiffs prepared a Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation and sent it to Defendant for 17 execution on November 8, 2013, but Defendant has failed to sign the Stipulation. Plaintiffs will 18 now prepare a Motion for Default Judgment and therefore request another continuance of the Case 19 Management Conference. 8. 20 There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently 21 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s 22 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled 23 Case Management Conference for approximately ninety (90) days, in order to allow for sufficient 24 time for Plaintiffs to prepare and file a Motion for Default Judgment. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / -2REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-00496 JSW P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page3 of 4 1 9. Plaintiffs recognize that a case management conference statement is due seven days 2 in advance of the case management conference date and that the statement must include all 3 elements requested in the “Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – 4 Contents of Joint Case Management Statement” pursuant to Local Rule 16-9. Should this Court 5 require Plaintiffs to file a Case Management Conference Statement, Plaintiffs will do so promptly. 6 Dated: January 2, 2014 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 7 By: 8 9 /S/ Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________, and all related deadlines are February 21, 2014 13 extended accordingly. The case management conference will be vacated if Plaintiffs file their motion for default judgment by February 14, 2014. 14 January 3, 2014 Date: ____________________ _________________________________________ 15 THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 12 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-00496 JSW P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx Case3:13-cv-00496-JSW Document28 Filed01/02/14 Page4 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 I, the undersigned, declare: 3 1. I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San 4 Francisco, State of California. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, San 5 Francisco, California 94104. 6 2. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action. 7 3. On January 2, 2014, I served the following document(s): 8 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT 9 CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 10 on the interested parties in said action by enclosing a true and exact copy of each document in a 11 sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and First Class mailing following our 12 ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and 13 processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for 14 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States 15 Postal Service in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 16 17 18 19 4. The envelopes were addressed and mailed as follows: Tim Kruse Construction, Inc. c/o Tim Kruse Agent for Service of Process 2824 Roven Ct. West Sacramento, CA 95691 Tim Kruse Construction, Inc. 550 Drever St. West Sacramento, CA 95691 20 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this 21 declaration was executed on January 2, 2014, at San Francisco, California. 22 /S/ 23 Alicia Rutkowski Paralegal 24 25 26 27 28 -4REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C13-00496 JSW P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Tim Kruse Construction, Inc\Pleadings\Request to Continue CMC 010214.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?