Alcaraz et al v. Napolitano et al
Filing
27
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 24, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
BERNAVE ALCARAZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C-13-0511 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
/
17
18
On June 7, 2013, plaintiffs electronically filed their First Amended Complaint, and, on
19
June 11, 2013, electronically filed a petition for appointment of a guardian ad litem.
20
Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders,
21
however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is
22
electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also
23
Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
24
Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
25
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
26
referenced documents. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply
27
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
28
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: June 24, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?