Cromwell et al v. United States Of America

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Case filed by Elisabeth Nergaard Olsen, John Eaton Cromwell, Jr.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/17/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DAVID M. MICHAEL, CSBN 74031
EDWARD M. BURCH, CSBN 255470
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. MICHAEL
One Sansome Street, Suite 3500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JOHN EATON CROMWELL, Jr and
ELISABETH NERGAARD OLSEN

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

JOHN EATON CROMWELL, Jr. and
ELISABETH NERGAARD OLSEN,

12

Plaintiffs,

13

v.

14

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

15

Case No. 3:13-cv-00519-EMC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ACTION

Defendant.
______________________________________/

16

[Proposed] ORDER

17
18

Due to the resolution of all remaining issues in this matter,

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between defendant UNITED STATES OF

20

AMERICA and claimants JOHN EATON CROMWELL, JR. AND ELISABETH NERGAARD

21

OLSEN, through undersigned counsel, that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each

22
party bearing its own costs.
23
24

This stipulation is entered into due to the fact that all property named in this action has

25

either been returned to claimants by Humboldt County authorities, administratively forfeited by

26

the Drug Enforcement Agency, or was never in the possession of the Drug Enforcement Agency.

27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION ;
[Proposed] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00519 EMC

1

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

2
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

3
4
5
6
Dated: 12 September 2013

s/David Countryman
DAVID COUNTRYMAN
Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: 12 September, 2013

s/David M. Michael
DAVID M. MICHAEL
Attorney for Plaintiffs
John Eaton Cromwell, Jr.
and Elisabeth Nergaard Olsen

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause having been shown,

15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice with each party

___________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
. Chen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
dward M
Judge E

21

RT

ER

H

23

NO

22

VED
APPRO

FO

20

LI

19

R NIA

9/17
Dated: _____________________, 2013

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

18

S

to bear its own costs.

RT
U
O

17

24
25

A

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION ;
[Proposed] ORDER
Case No. 3:13-cv-00519 EMC

2