CLiC Goggles, Inc. v. Handsome Rewards

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 14 re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Allow Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint filed by Blue Gem Sunglasses, In c., 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue July 31, 2013 Case Management Conference filed by Blue Gem Sunglasses, Inc. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/14/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 29, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CLIC GOGGLES, INC.,

Case No. 13-cv-00541-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

HANDSOME REWARDS,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
TO AUGUST 14
Re: ECF Nos. 39 & 40

12
13

The Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ stipulated request for leave to file a First

14

Amended Complaint. ECF No. 39. The Court also GRANTS the parties’ stipulated request to

15
16
17
18
19

CONTINUE the case management conference currently scheduled for July 31, 2013 to August 14,
2013 at 2:00 p.m. ECF No. 40. Attorney Harris may appear at the conference by telephone if
contacts the courtroom deputy at 415-522-2036 or [e-mail] not less than twentyfour hours before the conference and provides a direct dial number at which he can be reached
between 2:00 p.m. and 3:30 p.m the day of the conference.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The parties should be aware that, unless there is good cause for continuing federal court
supervision over a case, it is not the undersigned’s normal practice to exercise continuing
jurisdiction over a settlement agreement or to issue an injunction which has the effect of making
the violation of an agreement a federal cause of action. See, e.g., Regents of the Univ. of
Calif. v. International Medical Group, Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-00048-JST, Order Denying Request
to Retain Jurisdiction over Settlement Agreement, ECF No. 53 (N.D. Cal. July 9, 2013). If the
///
///

1

parties request that the Court exercise such jurisdiction, the request should also explain the

2

unusual circumstances that justify departure from this general rule.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2