CLiC Goggles, Inc. v. Handsome Rewards
Filing
49
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS BETWEEN CLIC GOGGLES AND STARCREST, AND BETWEEN BLUE GEM AND STARCREST re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by CLiC Goggles, Inc., 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Handsome Rewards. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 12, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CLIC GOGGLES, INC.,
Case No. 13-cv-00541-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
HANDSOME REWARDS,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL
OF CLAIMS BETWEEN CLIC
GOGGLES AND STARCREST, AND
BETWEEN BLUE GEM AND
STARCREST
Re: ECF Nos. 47 & 48
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff CliC Goggles, Inc. has filed a stipulation dismissing all of its claims against
Starcrest Products of California, Inc., with prejudice. ECF No. 47. Starcrest has also filed
stipulation jointly with Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff and Counterclaimant Blue Gem
Sunglasses, Inc. in which those parties’ claims against each other are dismissed without prejudice.
17
18
ECF No. 48. “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants . . . through a Rule 41(a)(1)
19
notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective
20
without court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: August 12, 2013
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?