Pitre v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 36

NOTICE RE MEETING REPORT re 35 Status Report filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
RICKY AND LORRAINE PITRE,

12
13
14
15
16

No. C 13-00552 WHA

Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MORTGAGE
SERVICER: ALSO KNOWN AS ASC
(AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY);
NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES,

NOTICE RE
MEETING REPORT

Defendants.

17

/

18
19

The Court thanks counsel for submitting a written report on the parties’ meeting to

20

discuss a loan modification on plaintiffs’ property. According to the report, plaintiffs are to

21

provide the bank with further documents regarding a possible loan modification by June 15. As

22

previously emphasized, the Court takes no position on whether a loan modification is appropriate

23

or required.

24

The report includes a statement from plaintiffs that they are “interested in receiving a 30

25

days extension” to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The order granting

26

defendants’ motion to dismiss set June 6 as the deadline to file such a motion. Plaintiffs may

27

have until JUNE 13 to file the motion and proposed amended complaint. The deadline will not be

28

extended further, absent good cause established by motion from plaintiffs and supported by

1

sworn declarations. The fact that plaintiffs may be simultaneously seeking a loan modification is

2

not sufficient to extend the deadline.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: June 3, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2