Pitre v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
50
THIRD ORDER HOLDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ABEYANCE AND SETTING FURTHER HEARING DATE re 39 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Motion and To Amend The Complaint filed by Lorraine Pitre. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/21/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
THIRD ORDER HOLDING
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
IN ABEYANCE AND SETTING
FURTHER HEARING DATE
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
MORTGAGE SERVICER: ALSO
KNOWN AS ASC (AMERICA’S
SERVICING COMPANY);
NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES,
18
Defendants.
/
19
20
No. C 13-00552 WHA
RICKY AND LORRAINE PITRE,
Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint has been held in abeyance
21
pending further proceedings. A hearing was set for August 22 to discuss plaintiffs’ loan
22
modification request. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a request to vacate the
23
August 22 hearing and to require the parties to jointly file a status update on the progress of the
24
loan modification review. Defendant states that it has received all necessary documents from
25
plaintiffs.
26
The hearing on August 22 is hereby VACATED. The parties must file a joint status update
27
by AUGUST 30 AT NOON. A further hearing is set for SEPTEMBER 5 AT 11A.M. As set forth in
28
prior orders (Dkt. No. 46), Wells Fargo must produce a Wells Fargo officer knowledgeable about
1
Wells Fargo’s loan modification process and the specific facts of plaintiffs’ loan modification
2
application(s) to be present and testify at the September 5 hearing.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: August 21, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?