Pitre v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 50

THIRD ORDER HOLDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ABEYANCE AND SETTING FURTHER HEARING DATE re 39 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Motion and To Amend The Complaint filed by Lorraine Pitre. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/21/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. THIRD ORDER HOLDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ABEYANCE AND SETTING FURTHER HEARING DATE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MORTGAGE SERVICER: ALSO KNOWN AS ASC (AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY); NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, 18 Defendants. / 19 20 No. C 13-00552 WHA RICKY AND LORRAINE PITRE, Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint has been held in abeyance 21 pending further proceedings. A hearing was set for August 22 to discuss plaintiffs’ loan 22 modification request. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a request to vacate the 23 August 22 hearing and to require the parties to jointly file a status update on the progress of the 24 loan modification review. Defendant states that it has received all necessary documents from 25 plaintiffs. 26 The hearing on August 22 is hereby VACATED. The parties must file a joint status update 27 by AUGUST 30 AT NOON. A further hearing is set for SEPTEMBER 5 AT 11A.M. As set forth in 28 prior orders (Dkt. No. 46), Wells Fargo must produce a Wells Fargo officer knowledgeable about 1 Wells Fargo’s loan modification process and the specific facts of plaintiffs’ loan modification 2 application(s) to be present and testify at the September 5 hearing. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: August 21, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?