Aguilar et al v. Zep Inc. et al
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 77 OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/15/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALEJANDRO P. GUTIERREZ, SBN 107688
HATHAWAY, PERRETT, WEBSTER, POWERS,
CHRISMAN & GUTIERREZ, APC
5450 Telegraph Road, Suite 200
Ventura, CA 93006-3577
telephone: (805) 644-7111
facsimile: (805) 644-8296
e-mail: agutierrez@hathawaylawfirm.com
DANIEL J. PALAY, SBN 159348
MICHAEL A. STRAUSS, SBN 246718
PALA Y LAW FIRM, APC
121 North Fir Street, Suite F
Ventura, CA 93 00 1
telephone: (805) 641-6600
facsimile: (805) 641-6607
e-mail: djp@palaylaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
DON AGUILAR, an individual; DAVID
ALEMAN, an individual; GEORGE
ALTOBELL, an individual; DENNIS
ASUNTO, an individual; MAX
BALLANTINE, an individual; STERLING
CALDER, an individual; BRIAN CALLE,
an individual; MARIO CERVANTEZ, an
individual; CURTIS CHANCELLOR, an
individual; GABRIEL COLLINS, an
individual; DELION CUMMINGS, an
individual; JERRY DAVIS, an individual;
KIRK DICKINSON, an individual;
GREGG DOBROW, an individual; BRIAN
DRUCKER, an individual; DAVID
ELDRIDGE, an individual; ROBERT
ESTERLY, an individual; RICHARD
FAIRCHILD, an individual; ROBERT
FELIX, an individual; JULIE FORTNER,
an individual; THOMAS FOWLER, an
individual; JEFFREY FULLER, an
individual; DAVID GARELICK, an
individual; REGINALD HAWKINS, an
individual; DOUGLAS HEFFERNAN, an
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS
PAGE 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
individual; ROBERT HOPPE, an
individual; KATHLEEN JANISCH, an
individual; ALAN JAY, an individual;
SUSAN JOHNSON, an individual;
CHRISTINA LAMB (PAYTON), an
individual; THERON LEE, an individual;
GARY LEVINE, an individual; WILLIAM
LOWE, an individual; DAN MANNION, an
individual; JASON MARTIN, an
individual; FELIX MONTES, an individual;
SAM MORA, an individual; ERIC
OFTEDAL, an individual; MARK
OSBORN, an individual; DAVID
OVADIA, an individual; RYAN PEREZ, an
individual; DAVID RAINS, an individual;
JAMES RICHMOND, an individual;
FLORENCE RODRIGUEZ, an individual;
JANET SALEH, an individual; JERMON
SCOTT, an individual; ROBERT
SEVERNS, an individual; JUSTIN
SHORES, an individual; GARRETT
SMITH, an individual; JAMES STEAD, an
individual; WILLIAM TELLOUS, an
individual; MICHELLE TOMPKINS, an
individual; GERALD TURNER, an
individual; ASTRID UNRINE, an
individual; LYNN WOODFORD, an
individual,
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
ZEP INC., a Delaware corporation;
ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.,
a Georgia corporation; and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE
AND NOW, this 15th day of
May
, 2013, this cause came before the Court
25
upon the parties’ Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to All Claims of Plaintiff
26
Gary Levine, and having reviewed the Stipulation, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS
PAGE 2
1
2
3
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Gary Levine’s claims in the above-captioned case are hereby
dismissed with prejudice.
May
15th
IT IS SO ORDERED, this _____ day of ______________, 2013.
4
5
6
7
______________________________________
Judge Richard G. Seeborg
United States District Court
Northern District of California, San Francisco Division
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS
PAGE 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?