Aguilar et al v. Zep Inc. et al

Filing 80

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 77 OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/15/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALEJANDRO P. GUTIERREZ, SBN 107688 HATHAWAY, PERRETT, WEBSTER, POWERS, CHRISMAN & GUTIERREZ, APC 5450 Telegraph Road, Suite 200 Ventura, CA 93006-3577 telephone: (805) 644-7111 facsimile: (805) 644-8296 e-mail: agutierrez@hathawaylawfirm.com DANIEL J. PALAY, SBN 159348 MICHAEL A. STRAUSS, SBN 246718 PALA Y LAW FIRM, APC 121 North Fir Street, Suite F Ventura, CA 93 00 1 telephone: (805) 641-6600 facsimile: (805) 641-6607 e-mail: djp@palaylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DON AGUILAR, an individual; DAVID ALEMAN, an individual; GEORGE ALTOBELL, an individual; DENNIS ASUNTO, an individual; MAX BALLANTINE, an individual; STERLING CALDER, an individual; BRIAN CALLE, an individual; MARIO CERVANTEZ, an individual; CURTIS CHANCELLOR, an individual; GABRIEL COLLINS, an individual; DELION CUMMINGS, an individual; JERRY DAVIS, an individual; KIRK DICKINSON, an individual; GREGG DOBROW, an individual; BRIAN DRUCKER, an individual; DAVID ELDRIDGE, an individual; ROBERT ESTERLY, an individual; RICHARD FAIRCHILD, an individual; ROBERT FELIX, an individual; JULIE FORTNER, an individual; THOMAS FOWLER, an individual; JEFFREY FULLER, an individual; DAVID GARELICK, an individual; REGINALD HAWKINS, an individual; DOUGLAS HEFFERNAN, an CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS PAGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 individual; ROBERT HOPPE, an individual; KATHLEEN JANISCH, an individual; ALAN JAY, an individual; SUSAN JOHNSON, an individual; CHRISTINA LAMB (PAYTON), an individual; THERON LEE, an individual; GARY LEVINE, an individual; WILLIAM LOWE, an individual; DAN MANNION, an individual; JASON MARTIN, an individual; FELIX MONTES, an individual; SAM MORA, an individual; ERIC OFTEDAL, an individual; MARK OSBORN, an individual; DAVID OVADIA, an individual; RYAN PEREZ, an individual; DAVID RAINS, an individual; JAMES RICHMOND, an individual; FLORENCE RODRIGUEZ, an individual; JANET SALEH, an individual; JERMON SCOTT, an individual; ROBERT SEVERNS, an individual; JUSTIN SHORES, an individual; GARRETT SMITH, an individual; JAMES STEAD, an individual; WILLIAM TELLOUS, an individual; MICHELLE TOMPKINS, an individual; GERALD TURNER, an individual; ASTRID UNRINE, an individual; LYNN WOODFORD, an individual, 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. ZEP INC., a Delaware corporation; ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC., a Georgia corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE AND NOW, this 15th day of May , 2013, this cause came before the Court 25 upon the parties’ Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to All Claims of Plaintiff 26 Gary Levine, and having reviewed the Stipulation, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS PAGE 2 1 2 3 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Gary Levine’s claims in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice. May 15th IT IS SO ORDERED, this _____ day of ______________, 2013. 4 5 6 7 ______________________________________ Judge Richard G. Seeborg United States District Court Northern District of California, San Francisco Division 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF GARY LEVINE CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00563 RS PAGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?