Raymat Materials, Inc. v. A&C Catalysts, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION by Hon. William Alsup granting 23 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)

4

LiLaw Inc., a law corporation
J. James Li, Ph.D. (SBN 202855)
5050 El Camino Real, Suite 200
Los Altos, California 94022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymat Materials, Inc.

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

12
13
14
15
16
17

RAYMAT MATERIALS, INC., a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
A&C CATALYSTS, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,
Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-cv-00567-WHA
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF
MEDIATION DEADLINE
PLACE: Courtroom 8 – 19th floor
JUDGE: Hon. William Alsup

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF MEDIATION DEADLINE
SV 346535344v1

Case No. 13-cv-00567-WHA

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, on May 13, 2013, the Court appointed Mr. David M. Bluhm as the mediator for
this case.
WHEREAS, the deadline to complete mediation was set on August 12th pursuant to ADR
L.R 6-4(b).
WHEREAS, the parties worked diligently with Mr. Bluhm to set the mediation date and
selected July 9, 2013 as the tentative mediation date.
WHEREAS, on the late afternoon of June 17, 2013, the plaintiff’s counsel learned that he has

8

to appear for an oral argument in front of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

9

on July 9, 2013 for a different case. Plaintiff’s counsel notified Mr. Bluhm and the opposing counsel

10

immediately of the scheduling conflict and requested to reschedule the mediation.

11

made every effort attempting to reschedule the mediation to another date before the August 12

12

deadline, but failed to do so due to scheduling conflicts of counsels and their clients.

13

All parties have

WHEREAS, all parties and the mediator have now agreed to a new mediation date of August

14

21, 2013, and thus request this Court’s approval to extend the mediation deadline by two weeks to

15

August 26, 2013.

16

WHEREAS, there have been no previous continuation of the mediation deadline.

17

WHEREAS, this will not impact any other scheduled hearings or deadlines;

18

NOW THEREFORE, for good cause, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby

19

stipulate an extension of the mediation deadline to August 26, 2013, to allow the parties to conduct

20

the mediation on August 21, 2013.

21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23

Dated: July 3, 2013

24

LiLaw Inc., a Law Corporation

25

By:

26

/s/ J. James Li
J. James Li
Attorney for Plaintiff
Raymat Materials Inc.

27
28
2

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF MEDIATION DEADLINE
SV 346535344v1

Case No. 13-cv-00567-WHA

1
2

Dated: July 3, 2013

Campinha Bacote LLP

3

By:

4

/s/ Carlton J. Willey
Carlton J. Willey
Attorney for Defendant
A&C Catalysts, Inc.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF MEDIATION DEADLINE
SV 346535344v1

Case No. 13-cv-00567-WHA

FILER’S ATTESTATION

1
2
3

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Carlton J. Willey.

4
5

Dated: July 3, 2013

6
LiLaw Inc., a Law Corporation

7

By:

8

/s/ J. James Li
J. James Li
Attorney for Plaintiff
Raymat Materials Inc.

9
10
11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated:

July 25, 2013.

16
17
The Honorable William Alsup
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF MEDIATION DEADLINE
SV 346535344v1

Case No. 13-cv-00567-WHA