Raymat Materials, Inc. v. A&C Catalysts, Inc.

Filing 62

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECONDAMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER re 56 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Raymat Materials, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 25, 2014. Opposition due April 7 and Reply due April 14.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2014)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9

RAYMAT MATERIALS, INC., a
California corporation,
Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12

v.
A&C CATALYSTS, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,

13

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
A SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
AMENDED MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
REQUEST TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendant and Third-Party
Plaintiff,

14
15

No. C 13-00567 WHA

v.

16

PROTAMEEN CHEMICALS, INC., a
New Jersey corporation,

17

Third-Party Defendant.
/

18
19

On March 12, plaintiff filed a four-page motion for leave to file a second amended

20

complaint, noticed for May 1. On March 24, two days before the opposition was due, plaintiff

21

filed an amended motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and request to amend the

22

scheduling order (Dkt. Nos. 56, 61). In light of the amended motion, the motion for leave to file

23

a second amended complaint, dated March 12, is DENIED AS MOOT (Dkt. No. 56). The

24

opposition to the amended motion is due APRIL 7 and the reply is due APRIL 14.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE