Raymat Materials, Inc. v. A&C Catalysts, Inc.
Filing
70
ORDER SETTING HEARING RE A&C CATALYSTS DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND REQUESTING AMENDED CHAMBERS COPIES re 68 Discovery Letter Brief regarding Defendant A&C's Motion to Compel Emmanuel Balsamides, Sr., Alexis Wade, and Protameen Chemicals, I nc. to Appear for Completion of Deposition (Dkt. 67) filed by A&C Catalysts, Inc. Responses due by 4/11/2014. Three hour meet-and-confer from 7:30--10:30 A.M. 4/15/2014 in Court's jury room. Motion Hearing set for 4/15/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 8, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
ORDER SETTING HEARING
RE A&C CATALYSTS’
DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND
REQUESTING AMENDED
CHAMBERS’ COPIES
A&C CATALYSTS, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,
16
Defendant and Third-Party
Plaintiff,
17
18
No. C 13-00567 WHA
RAYMAT MATERIALS, INC., a
California corporation,
v.
19
PROTAMEEN CHEMICALS, INC., a
New Jersey corporation,
20
Third-Party Defendant.
21
/
22
In this action alleging breach of contract and intentional interference with contractual
23
relations, fact discovery closed on March 28, motions to compel were due April 4, and trial is
24
scheduled for June 30, 2014 (Dkt. No. 16). On March 24, plaintiff Raymat Materials, Inc. filed a
25
motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and request to amend the scheduling order,
26
noticed for May 1 (Dkt. No. 61). On April 3, plaintiff Raymat and third-party defendant
27
Protameen Chemicals, Inc. filed two motions for summary judgment, noticed for May 8 (Dkt.
28
Nos. 64, 65). A 249-page declaration was filed with no exhibits tabs. By APRIL 10, chambers’
copies of the motion and declarations shall please be re-submitted with exhibit tabs.
1
On April 3, defendant and third-party plaintiff A&C Catalysts, Inc. filed a discovery
2
letter and “motion to compel Emmanuel Balsamides, Sr., Alexis Wade, and third-party defendant
3
Protameen Chemicals, Inc. to appear for completion of deposition,” noticed for a hearing on
4
May 1 (less than 35-days after the motion was filed). The motion is based on a series of
5
depositions which occurred around March 3. A&C Catalysts stated that the parties had two
6
“telephone calls” regarding their dispute on March 21 and March 31 (Dkt. No. 67).
7
The Court SETS a three hour meet-and-confer in the Court’s jury room in the
At 10:30 A.M., the Court shall hold a hearing. The response to A&C Catalysts’ discovery letter
10
is due by NOON ON APRIL 11. Please buzz chambers at 7:30 a.m. on April 15 to be let into the
11
For the Northern District of California
federal courthouse in San Francisco from 7:30–10:30 A.M. ON TUESDAY APRIL 15, 2014.
9
United States District Court
8
jury room. Please note that only those lawyers who personally attend the meet-and-confer in the
12
Court’s jury room may be heard at the hearing.
13
By NOON ON APRIL 11, A&C Catalysts shall file in full the relevant (text-searchable)
14
deposition transcripts for Emmanuel Balsamides, Sr., Alexis Wade, and Protameen because it is
15
difficult to determine the extent of the alleged refusal to answer and/or counsel interference
16
based on the limited excerpts filed. Chambers’ copies may flag the relevant pages using sticky-
17
notes. If an administrative motion for leave to file under seal is required, the parties shall
18
promptly meet and confer to jointly propose narrowly-tailored redactions (limited to the
19
pertinent lines) with supporting declarations justifying the lines sought to be sealed. Please be
20
reasonable.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: April 8, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?