Raymat Materials, Inc. v. A&C Catalysts, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER RESETTING DISCOVERY HEARING TO APRIL 22 AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 70 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings, 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING RESPONSE TIME AND HEARING TIME filed by A&C Catalysts, Inc. Discovery Hearing set for 4/22/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.Responses due by noon on 4/15/2014. Three hour meet-and-confer from 7:30--10:30 A.M. 4/22/2014 in Court's jury room. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 8, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
ORDER RESETTING
DISCOVERY HEARING TO
APRIL 22 AND MODIFYING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A&C CATALYSTS, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,

16

Defendant and Third-Party
Plaintiff,

17
18

No. C 13-00567 WHA

RAYMAT MATERIALS, INC., a
California corporation,

v.

19

PROTAMEEN CHEMICALS, INC., a
New Jersey corporation,

20

Third-Party Defendant.
/

21
22

On April 4, defendant A&C Catalysts filed a discovery letter (and motion to compel,

23

noticed for May 1). An April 8 order set a three-hour meet-and-confer and hearing for April 15.

24

The parties then filed a stipulation seeking to reset the discovery hearing for April 22 (with

25

responses due April 15) and extend the briefing schedule for plaintiff Raymat Materials, Inc. and

26

third-party defendant Protameen Chemicals, Inc.’s two motions for summary judgment because

27

lead trial counsel will be on his honeymoon the week of April 14. The schedule is hereby

28

modified as follows:

1

1.

The Court SETS a three hour meet-and-confer in the Court’s jury room in the

2

federal courthouse in San Francisco from 7:30–10:30 A.M. ON TUESDAY APRIL 22, 2014. At

3

10:30 A.M., the Court shall hold a hearing. The response to A&C Catalysts’ discovery letter

4

is due by NOON ON APRIL 15. Please note that only those lawyers who personally attend the

5

meet-and-confer in the Court’s jury room may be heard at the hearing.

6

2.

The response to Raymat and Protameen’s motions for summary judgment are due

7

by NOON ON APRIL 22. The reply is due by NOON ON APRIL 29. Oral argument remains on

8

calendar for MAY 8.

9
IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Dated: April 9, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2