Surfacesupplied, Inc v. Kirby Morgan Dive Systems, Inc

Filing 107

ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 21, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq., No. 125,378
[e-mail]
David B. Sandelands, Esq., No. 198,252
[e-mail]
Mark D. Nielsen, Esq., No. 210,023
[e-mail]
CISLO & THOMAS LLP
1333 2nd Street, Suite 500
Santa Monica, California 90401-4110
Telephone: [phone]
Telefax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant,
KIRBY MORGAN DIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

SUITE 500
1333 2 nd Street
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys at Law

CISLO & THOMAS LLP

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SURFACE SUPPLIED, INC., a California )
)
corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
KIRBY MORGAN DIVE SYSTEMS, INC.,)
)
a California Corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
_______________________________
)
KIRBY MORGAN DIVE SYSTEMS, INC.,)
)
a California Corporation,
)
)
)
Counterclaimant,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SURFACE SUPPLIED, INC., a California )
corporation; Heliox TECHNOLOGIES,
)
INC., a California corporation; and JASON )
VAN DER SCHYFF, an individual, and
)
DOES 1-9,
)
)
Counter-Defendants.
)
)
)

CASE NO. CV 13-0575 MMC
[Hon. Maxine M. Chesney]
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a)(2)

1

[Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C 13-0575 MMC

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Surface Supplied, Inc. (“Surface Supplied”), Counter-

(“Kirby Morgan”) (collectively “the Parties”) have jointly moved this Court for an order of

6

dismissal pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Parties request that the Court

7

incorporate the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement into the dismissal order by reference

8
SUITE 500
1333 2 nd Street
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

(“Van der Schyff”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Kirby Morgan Dive Systems, Inc.

5

Attorneys at Law

Defendant Heliox Technologies, Inc. (“Heliox”), Counter-Defendant Jason Van der Schyff

4

CISLO & THOMAS LLP

3

and that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement under the authority of Kokkonen

9

v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381-382, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1994).

10

The Court finds that the Parties’ settlement agreement is complete; includes a statement that the

11

Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement; and, has been executed by the Parties.

12
13
14

Proof having been made to the satisfaction of the Court that the Motion should be
granted, and good cause appearing therefore,

15
16

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that:

17
18

(1)

19
20

entirety, with prejudice;
(2)

21
22
23

Pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), this action is dismissed, in its

(3)

filed March 20, 2014, as
The terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement, appended to this Order as
to the Declaration of Daniel M. Cislo
Exhibit A, are incorporated herein by reference; and
^
The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

March 21
Date: ______________, 2014
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

28

2

[Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C 13-0575 MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Respectfully submitted,
CISLO & THOMAS, LLP
By:

/s/Daniel M. Cislo
Daniel M. Cislo
David B. Sandelands
Mark D. Nielsen
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,
KIRBY MORGAN DIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

SUITE 500
1333 2 nd Street
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys at Law

CISLO & THOMAS LLP

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

[Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Case No. C 13-0575 MMC