Shin et al v. NDEX West LLC et al
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/5/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
YONG T. SHIN and SANG EUN SHIN,
9
Plaintiffs,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 13-00579 WHA
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK
SOUTHWEST, N.A. F/K/A WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB and NDEX WEST, LLC,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
On February 14, 2013, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a motion to dismiss.
17
Plaintiffs’ response was due by March 4, but none was received. An order was issued setting the
18
briefing schedule such that plaintiffs’ opposition was due April 2 (Dkt. No. 18). The order
19
explicitly noted for the benefit of pro se plaintiffs that “failure to timely respond to the motion to
20
dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action being dismissed for failure to
21
prosecute” (ibid.). No opposition has been filed.
22
Pro se plaintiffs Yong T. Shin and Sang Eun Shin are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE
23
why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must file a written
24
response to this order by NOON ON APRIL 17. Plaintiffs are again warned that if no response is
25
timely filed, the motion to dismiss may be granted or the action may be dismissed for failure to
26
prosecute.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 5, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?