Shin et al v. NDEX West LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/5/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

YONG T. SHIN and SANG EUN SHIN,

9

Plaintiffs,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 13-00579 WHA

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK
SOUTHWEST, N.A. F/K/A WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB and NDEX WEST, LLC,

14

Defendants.

15

/

16

On February 14, 2013, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a motion to dismiss.

17

Plaintiffs’ response was due by March 4, but none was received. An order was issued setting the

18

briefing schedule such that plaintiffs’ opposition was due April 2 (Dkt. No. 18). The order

19

explicitly noted for the benefit of pro se plaintiffs that “failure to timely respond to the motion to

20

dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action being dismissed for failure to

21

prosecute” (ibid.). No opposition has been filed.

22

Pro se plaintiffs Yong T. Shin and Sang Eun Shin are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE

23

why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must file a written

24

response to this order by NOON ON APRIL 17. Plaintiffs are again warned that if no response is

25

timely filed, the motion to dismiss may be granted or the action may be dismissed for failure to

26

prosecute.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 5, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE