Shin et al v. NDEX West LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/5/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 YONG T. SHIN and SANG EUN SHIN, 9 Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 13-00579 WHA v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK SOUTHWEST, N.A. F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB and NDEX WEST, LLC, 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 On February 14, 2013, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed a motion to dismiss. 17 Plaintiffs’ response was due by March 4, but none was received. An order was issued setting the 18 briefing schedule such that plaintiffs’ opposition was due April 2 (Dkt. No. 18). The order 19 explicitly noted for the benefit of pro se plaintiffs that “failure to timely respond to the motion to 20 dismiss may result in the motion being granted or the action being dismissed for failure to 21 prosecute” (ibid.). No opposition has been filed. 22 Pro se plaintiffs Yong T. Shin and Sang Eun Shin are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE 23 why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must file a written 24 response to this order by NOON ON APRIL 17. Plaintiffs are again warned that if no response is 25 timely filed, the motion to dismiss may be granted or the action may be dismissed for failure to 26 prosecute. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?