Wellens et al v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Filing 171

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING granting 170 STIPULATION - Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing as to 167 First Motion for Settlement continued to 9/30/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/02/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SACHA STEENHOEK, SBN 253743 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 442-1267 Fax: (415) 442-1001 ssteenhoek@morganlewis.com DAVID SANDFORD, Pro Hac Vice To Be Filed SANFORD HEISLER KIMPEL, LLP dsanford@sanfordheisler.com 1666 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20009 (202) 499-5200 (main) (202) 499-5201 (fax) SARI M. ALAMUDDIN, Pro Hac Vice ALLISON N. POWERS, Pro Hac Vice MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 77 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-5094 Tel: (312) 324-1000 Fax: (312) 324-1001 salamuddin@morganlewis.com apowers@morganlewis.com FELICIA MEDINA, SBN 255804 fmedina@sanfordheisler.com YONINA ALEXANDER, SBN 284908 yalexander@sanfordheisler.com SANFORD HEISLER KIMPEL, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 795-2020 (main) (415) 795-2021 (fax) Attorneys for the Plaintiffs and the Class BLAIR J. ROBINSON, Pro Hac Vice A. KLAIR FITZPATRICK, Pro Hac Vice MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 T: (215) 963-5000 F: (215) 963-5001 blair.robinson@morganlewis.com kfitzpatrick@morganlewis.com Attorneys for the Defendant 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 SARA WELLENS, KELLY JENSEN, JACQUELINE PENA, BERNICE GIOVANNI, LARA HOLLINGER, and JENNIFER BENNIE on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 23 24 v. 25 DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., 26 27 28 Defendant. Case No. C 13-00581 WHO (DMR) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, on August 28, 2015, Plaintiffs submitted a Motion For Preliminary Approval of the Class Settlement (“Motion”) (Dkt No. 167); WHEREAS, on August 28, 2015, the Parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement requesting that the September 8, 2015 Case Management Conference be vacated and a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion be set at the Court’s earliest convenience (Dkt No. 167); WHEREAS, on August 31, 2015, the Court set a Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing (“Hearing”) for September 16, 2015 (Dkt No. 169); WHEREAS, Defense Counsel has a conflict on September, 16, 2015; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Defendant Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and Plaintiffs Sara Wellens, Kelly Jensen, Jacqueline Pena, Bernice Giovanni, Lara Hollinger, and Jennifer Bennie, by their attorneys, and subject to Court approval, as follows: The Hearing on September 16, 2015 will be continued to September 30, 2015. Dated: September 1, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 14 /s/ Felicia Medina Felicia Medina, on behalf of Plaintiffs and the Class 15 16 /s/ Sari M. Alamuddin Sari M. Alamuddin, on behalf of Defendant 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING CASE NO. C 13-00581 WHO (DMR) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 For the reasons described above, and for good cause shown, the Case Management 3 Conference and Motion Hearing date is hereby modified as per the Parties’ agreement. The Case 4 Management Conference currently scheduled for September 16, 2015 shall be vacated and 5 continued to September 30, 2015 at __________. 6 7 8 September 2, 2015 DATE: ______________________ _____________________________________ The Honorable William H. Orrick United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING CASE NO. C 13-00581 WHO (DMR)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?