Martinez v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
Filing
32
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE (Dkt. No. 27). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/3/2013 (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
RONALD MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 13-0584 RS (JSC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE
(Dkt. No. 27)
15
16
HSBC BANK USA,
Defendant.
17
18
19
Plaintiff Ronald Martinez sues his former employer, HSBC Bank USA, for age and
20
disability discrimination among other claims. Defendant served subpoenas on Plaintiff’s prior
21
employers, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, as well as a subsequent employer, Union Bank,
22
for certain personnel records. Plaintiff seeks to quash the subpoenas on the ground they seek
23
irrelevant information protected by the California Constitution’s right to privacy. Bank of
24
America and Wells Fargo, however, already produced documents to Defendant pursuant to the
25
subpoena.
26
27
28
As stated on the record at the October 3, 2013 hearing, Defendant shall provide copies
of the documents produced by Bank of America and Wells Fargo to Plaintiff and such
1
documents shall be maintained as confidential under the protective order. The Court declines
2
to order Defendant to return any of the produced documents.
3
Further, the subpoena to Union Bank is quashed in light of Plaintiff’s production of his
4
W-2 statements and his counsel’s agreement to stipulate that Plaintiff did not seek any
5
medical accommodations while employed at Union Bank.
6
This Order disposes of Docket No. 27.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 3, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?