Sewell et al v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Filing 59

ORDER re 44 MOTION for Settlement. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 8/20/2014. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANDREA SEWELL, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Case No. 13-cv-00588-TEH ORDER RE: HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Defendant. 13 14 This matter is scheduled for hearing on Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for 15 preliminary approval of class action settlement on August 25, 2014. After reviewing the 16 supplemental papers submitted in response to the Court’s July 10, 2014 Order, the Court 17 has additional questions about the proposed settlement: 18 1. The objection procedures set out in the Settlement Agreement and Proposed Order 19 provide that objections shall be submitted to the Settlement Administrator whereas the 20 proposed Class Notice states that objections shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Court. 21 Compare Docket No. 46-1 at ¶¶ 85-93 (Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Class 22 Action Settlement Agreement and Release), and Docket No. 58 ¶ 9 (Proposed Order), with 23 Docket No. 58-1 at 4 (Class Notice providing for objection procedures). What explains 24 this discrepancy? 25 2. If either the Settlement Agreement and Proposed Order, or the Class Notice, require 26 amendment in response to Question 1, must the parties send amended notice to the relevant 27 State and Federal officials in order to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1715(b)? 28 The parties shall come to the August 25, 2014 hearing prepared to address these 1 2 issues. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 08/20/14 _____________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?