Snowden v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/16/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER (SBN 178491) JOSEPH C. WILSON (SBN 249027) 2 CURIALE WILSON LLP One Maritime Plaza, Suite 1000 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 908-1001 4 Fax: (415) 796-0875 ckeller@curialewilson.com 5 jwilson@curialewilson.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff KIM SNOWDEN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM SNOWDEN, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, AND DOES 1-20, 15 Defendants. 16 Case Number: C 13-00653 RS ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Before the Hon. Richard Seeborg Trial Date: August 25, 2014 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE C 13-00653 RS 1 1 Whereas, the deadline for non-expert discovery to be completed is currently set for January 2 31, 2014. 3 Whereas, the parties have met and conferred and wish to extend the deadline for 4 non-expert discovery to be completed. 5 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT the deadline for non-expert discovery will 6 be extended to March 31, 2014. No other deadlines shall be effected by this stipulation. 7 8 Dated: December 12, 2013 CURIALE WILSON LLP 9 /s/ Joseph C. Wilson JOSEPH C. WILSON Attorneys for Plaintiff Kim Snowden 10 11 12 Dated: December 12, 2013 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 13 14 15 16 /s/ Harold M. Brody HAROLD M. BRODY Attorneys for Defendant Sprint/United Management Co., Inc. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE C 13-00653 RS 2 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: December ____, 2013 16 5 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE C 13-00653 RS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?