Schafer et al v. Association for Small, Closely Held Businesses et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT LANGRALL by Hon. William Alsup granting 21 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

1
2
3
4

Clifford S. Davidson, SBN 246119
[e-mail]
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP
1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1400
Portland, OR 97205-3089
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Brent Schafer and Todd Construction, Inc.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
BRENT SCHAFER and TODD

12 CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oregon
13

corporation,
Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case No. C 13-00659 WHA
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS
DEFENDANT CLARKE LANGRALL, JR.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.
ASSOCIATION FOR SMALL,

16 CLOSELY HELD BUSINESSES, a
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CMC: May 9, 2013

Delaware corporation; CRONIN
INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., a
California corporation; ESTATE OF
LAWRENCE D. CRONIN; KENNETH
FEHL; and CLARK LANGRALL, JR.,
Defendants.
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2013, plaintiffs filed the Complaint initiating this action, in
which plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that Clarke Langrall, Jr., erroneously sued as Clark
Langrall, Jr. (“Langrall”), was liable to plaintiffs for negligence;
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2013, Langrall filed his Motion to Dismiss, which was based
in part on alleged lack of personal jurisdiction;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Langrall wish to avoid additional motion practice related to
the issue of personal jurisdiction;
-1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLARKE LANGRALL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:13-cv-00659-WHA

1

WHEREAS, Langrall has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment;

2

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Langrall stipulate and agree that, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the

3

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Langrall will be dismissed from this action without prejudice;

4

THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Langrall hereby stipulate, through their counsel of record,

5

that Clarke Lagrall, Jr., erroneously sued as Clark Langrall, Jr., is dismissed from this action

6

without prejudice.

7
8
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP

9

By /S/
Clifford S. Davidson

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brent Schafer and
Todd Construction, Inc

12
13

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures

14

indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

15
16

ADELBERG, RUDOW, DORF & HENDLER, LLC

17

By /S/
Andrew Radding

18
19

Attorneys for Defendant
Clarke Langrall, Jr.

20
21

Defendant Langrall's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) is Denied as Moot.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24

April 22, 2013.
______________
Date

_____________________________
Judge William Alsup
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

-2JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLARKE LANGRALL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:13-cv-00659-WHA