Schafer et al v. Association for Small, Closely Held Businesses et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hon. William Alsup granting 40 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 Submitted by: 2 Clifford S. Davidson, SBN 246119 cdavidson@sussmanshank.com SUSSMAN SHANK LLP 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1400 Portland, OR 97205-3089 Telephone: (503) 227-1111 Facsimile: (503) 248-0130 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brent Schafer and Todd Construction, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 BRENT SCHAFER and TODD 12 CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oregon 13 corporation, Plaintiffs, 14 15 Case No. C 13-00659 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. ASSOCIATION FOR SMALL, 16 CLOSELY HELD BUSINESSES, a 17 18 19 Delaware corporation; and CRONIN INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, Deadline to Amend Pleadings: 08/31/13 Discovery Cutoff: 04/30/14 Trial: 06/30/14 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE SAC Case No. C 13-00659 WHA 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR 2 LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3 4 5 6 7 8 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Request for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (the “Request”), hereby GRANTS the Request. The [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, attached to the Request as Exhibit A, is deemed filed as of this date. Plaintiffs shall present to the Clerk of Court an appropriate summons for issuance and service upon the Association for Small, Closely-Held Business Enterprises. 9 10 11 August 2, 2013. ______________ Date _____________________________ Judge William Alsup United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE SAC Case No. C 13-00659 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?