Schafer et al v. Association for Small, Closely Held Businesses et al
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hon. William Alsup granting 40 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)
1
Submitted by:
2
Clifford S. Davidson, SBN 246119
cdavidson@sussmanshank.com
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP
1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1400
Portland, OR 97205-3089
Telephone: (503) 227-1111
Facsimile: (503) 248-0130
3
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Brent Schafer and Todd Construction, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
BRENT SCHAFER and TODD
12 CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Oregon
13
corporation,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
Case No. C 13-00659 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO
FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
ASSOCIATION FOR SMALL,
16 CLOSELY HELD BUSINESSES, a
17
18
19
Delaware corporation; and CRONIN
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation,
Deadline to Amend Pleadings: 08/31/13
Discovery Cutoff:
04/30/14
Trial:
06/30/14
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE SAC
Case No. C 13-00659 WHA
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR
2
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
3
4
5
6
7
8
The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Request for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint (the “Request”), hereby GRANTS the Request.
The [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, attached to the Request as Exhibit
A, is deemed filed as of this date.
Plaintiffs shall present to the Clerk of Court an appropriate summons for issuance
and service upon the Association for Small, Closely-Held Business Enterprises.
9
10
11
August 2, 2013.
______________
Date
_____________________________
Judge William Alsup
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE SAC
Case No. C 13-00659 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?