Schafer et al v. Association for Small, Closely Held Businesses et al

Filing 53

ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/3/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 Northern District of California 9 San Francisco Division 10 BRENT SCHAFER, et al., 11 No. C 13-0659 WHA 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION 13 14 15 ASSOCIATION FOR SMALL CLOSELYHELD BUSINESS ENTERPRISES, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ Date: Mediator: December 10, 2013 George Fisher 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request to excuse plaintiffs Brent Schafer, Todd Construction, Inc., and defendant representative Ellen Cronin from appearing in person at the December 10, 2013, mediation session before George Fisher is GRANTED. Your letter presumes that it is appropriate for the insurance representative to participate by phone; however, the Court reminds counsel that ADR L.R. 6-10(c) explicitly requires insurance carrier representatives to be present in person unless excused pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-10(d). Nonetheless, in the absence of objection from the mediator or plaintiff’s counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the insurance representative for defendants is also excused from appearing in person at the mediation. The excused parties shall be available at all times to participate telephonically in the mediation pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-10(f). However, if the mediator determines that the telephonic 1 2 3 appearance by the individuals is interfering with the mediation process, the mediator may decide to terminate the telephonic appearances and set a new mediation date with personal appearances required. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 December 3, 2013 By: Dated Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?