Alexander v. United States Of America

Filing 49

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 42); ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 35); ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magsitrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/8/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)

Alexander v. United States Of America

Doc. 49

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

ANN MARIE ALEXANDER,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15

THE UNITED STATES,

16

Case No.: 13-00678 JSC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 42); ORDER
RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL (Dkt. No. 35); ORDER
RESCHEDULING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendant.

17
18

This action concerns the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s failure to respond to

19

Plaintiff’s Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request within the required 20 days after

20

receiving Plaintiff’s request.

21

The Court previously denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment because it

22

concerned no claims at issue in this case; rather, the motion attempted to litigate claims that

23

had previously been dismissed. (See Dkt. No. 41.) The same day the Court issued its Order

24

denying Plaintiff’s motion, Plaintiff filed another summary judgment motion, which again far

25

exceeds the scope of this case. The Court accordingly DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for the

26

same reasons it denied Plaintiff’s previous motion. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff

27

shall not file any additional motions for summary judgment until the Case Management

28

Dockets.Justia.com

1

Conference (“CMC”), at which time the Court will discuss with the parties their case

2

schedules.

3

In addition, the Court VACATES the briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s motion to

4

compel. (Dkt. No. 35.) At the CMC, the Court will discuss with the parties any further

5

briefing that is needed for Plaintiff’s motion.

6

Finally, the Court reschedules the CMC for September 12, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: August 8, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2