Smith v. Allen

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING 11 STIPULATION selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/6/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

MARK J. BLUER (157071)
BLUER & BLUER
222 Sutter Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94108
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
CRAIGNESHIA SMITH

6
7
8
9
10
11

GARY R. BASHAM (SBN 130119)
NANCY L. MCCOY (SBN 184983)
BASHAM LAW GROUP
1990 N. California Blvd., Suite 530
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for DEFENDANT
DENISE BASS ALLEN, D.D.S.

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

CRAIGNESHIA SMITH,

18
19

Case No. 3:13-CV-0689-JSW

PLAINTIFF,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.

20
21
22

Trial Date:
Complaint Filed:

None set
January 23, 2013

DENISE BASS ALLEN, DDS.; and DOES 1-10,
DEFENDANTS.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
1

1
2
3
4

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:

5

☐

Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

6
________________________________________________________________________
7
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
8

☐

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the

9
order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
10
other requested deadline September 30, 2013
11
Dated: May 3, 2013

BASHAM LAW GROUP

12
13
By:

14
15

/s/
Nancy L. McCoy
Attorney for Defendant,
DENISE BASS ALLEN, D.D.S.

16
17

Dated: May 3, 2013

BLUER & BLUER

18
19

By:

20
21
22
23
24

/s/
Mark J. Bluer
Attorney for Plaintiff,
CRAIGNESHIA SMITH

[PROPOSED] ORDER
x
☐
☐

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: May 6, 2013

___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
2