Parker v. J.M. Smucker Co.

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/21/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

JENNER & BLOCK LLP
Kenneth K. Lee (Cal. Bar No. 264296)
[e-mail]
Kate T. Spelman (Cal. Bar No. 269109)
[e-mail]
633 West 5th Street, Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2054
Phone:
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
Dean N. Panos (applying pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
353 N. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for J.M. Smucker Co.

11
12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

DIANA PARKER, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
vs.

No. CV 13-00690-JCS
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Action Filed: February 15, 2013

J.M. SMUCKER CO., an Ohio Corporation,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1
2

Plaintiff Diana Parker, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, and Defendant the
J.M. Smucker Company, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

3

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”);

4

WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on March 1, 2013;

5

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant’s response

6
7
8
9
10

to the Complaint would be due on March 22, 2013;
WHEREAS Plaintiff has agreed to allow Defendant an additional 30 days to respond to the
Complaint, making Defendant’s response due on April 22, 2013; and
WHEREAS the extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by
Court order;

11

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), that Defendant

12

shall have an additional 30 days to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including April 22, 2013.

13
14

Dated: March 19, 2013

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

15

_/s Kenneth K. Lee_________________
By: Kenneth K. Lee

16

Attorneys for Defendant

17
18
19

Dated: March 19, 2013

BLOOD, HURST & O’REARDON, LLP

20

_/s Timothy G. Blood______________
By: Timothy G. Blood

21

Attorneys for Plaintiff

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

ATTESTATION

2

I, Kenneth K. Lee, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the

3

Stipulation Enlarging Time to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I

4

hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory

5

Timothy G. Blood.

6

R NIA

ERED

pero
ph C. S

LI

ER

FO

se
Judge Jo

A

H

11

RT

10

O ORD

IT IS S

NO

9

Dated: 3/21/13

UNIT
ED

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT