Leghorn et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
127
ORDER GRANTING re 102 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Arley Leghorn, Valerie Leghorn. Signed by Judge Joseph C.Spero on 9/23/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANSISCO DIVISION
1
2
3
4
5
ARLEY and VALERIE LEGHORN,
as individuals, as representatives of the
classes, and on behalf of the general public,
6
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 3:13-cv-00708-JCS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
(ECF NO. 138)
7
v.
[CIVIL L.R. 79-5(D)]
8
9
10
11
12
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS
FARGO INSURANCE, INC., QBE
INSURANCE CORPORATION, AND
QBE FIRST INSURANCE AGENCY,
INC.,
Assigned for all Purposes to Magistrate Judge
Joseph C. Spero
Action Filed: February 19, 2013
Trial date:
None Set
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Proposed Order
Case No. 3:13-cv-00708-JCS
1
Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion For Sealing Order (ECF No. 102) having been filed
2 and the designated documents lodged with the Clerk, and Defendants QBE Insurance
3 Corporation (“QBEIC”) and QBE FIRST Insurance Agency, Inc. (“QBE FIRST”) (collectively,
4 “the QBE Defendants”) having filed a declaration in support of the motion pursuant to L.R. 795 5(d), the matter having been submitted, and good cause having been shown pursuant to L.R. 79-5
6 and Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006), the Court
7 finds that the declaration filed by the QBE Defendants establishes that the material designated
8 “confidential” is entitled to protection under the law because it is confidential and proprietary
9 and the QBE Defendants use reasonable efforts to maintain the secrecy of this type of
10 information, and further its disclosure would: (1) assist the QBE Defendants’ competitors by
11 allowing them to unfairly compete; (2) harm the QBE Defendants because competitors would
12 become aware of the QBE Defendants’ confidential business information; and (3) destroy the
13 Defendants’ competitive business advantage by permitting competitors to modify their own
14 policies and procedures based on confidential information, and thus,
15
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to seal is GRANTED as follows:
16
The Court hereby orders that the following materials attached to the Declaration of Kai
17 Richter in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 108) shall remain filed
18 under seal, for the above reasons, and each and every one of the reasons set forth in the
19 Declaration of Mark Chapman:
20
Exhibit 8 (Excerpts from the Deposition of Mark Chapman pp. 93-95),
21
Exhibits 13-18 (ZC Sterling/Wells Fargo Agreements),
22
Exhibit 52 (Expert Report of Birny Birnbaum), and
23
Page 3, Lines 17-25; Page 4, Lines 1-8; and Page 10, Lines 3-7 of Plaintiffs’
24 Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification and Memorandum of Points and
25 Authorities in Support, ECF No. 103.
26
27
28
1
Proposed Order
Case No. 4:13-cv-00708-JCS
S
ER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
R NIA
A
H
5
Sp
FO
seph C.
Judge Jo
LI
RT
4
____________________________________
Hon. Joseph C. Spero
Magistrate Judge, United Statesro
District Court
e
NO
3
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
1 DATED: ___________________
09/23/13
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
2
Proposed Order
Case No. 4:13-cv-00708-JCS
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?