Sessoms v. Thornton et al

Filing 100

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND CASEMANAGEMENT DEADLINES 99 .(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 6 IVOR SAMSON (State Bar No. 52767) ivor.samson@dentons.com BONNIE LAU (State Bar No. 246188) bonnie.lau@dentons.com JESSICA L. DUGGAN (State Bar No. 271703) jessica.duggan@dentons.com DENTONS US LLP 525 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2708 Telephone: (415) 882-5000 Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff TIO DINERO SESSOMS 8 13 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JOHN P. DEVINE Supervising Deputy Attorney General SUSAN J. KAWALA (State Bar No. 178612) Susan.Kawala@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5708 Facsimile: (415) 703-5480 14 Attorneys for Defendant DARRIN BRIGHT 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 TIO DINERO SESSOMS, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No. CV 13-0714 WHA (PR) v. R.N. HELEN THORNTON; R.N. FRANCES SSEMPEBWA; DR. EDWARD BIRDSONG; DR. KUMAR; DR. POMPAN; DR. JOHN DOWBAK; DR. ELIZABETH B. SCHNEIDER; DR. T.W. WY; DR. BRIGHT; DR. A. ADAMS; G. ELLIS; RANDY GROUNDS, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES Defendants. 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV13-00714 WHA (PR) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 1 STIPULATION 2 Plaintiff Tio Dinero Sessoms and Defendant Darren Bright, by and through their 3 undersigned counsel, respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation pursuant 4 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-2 for a brief extension of (1) the 5 opposition and reply brief deadlines and hearing date for Defendant’s motion for summary 6 judgment; and (2) the case management statement deadline and case management conference. 7 In support of this stipulation, the undersigned parties provide the following facts: 8 1. 9 On May 5, 2015, this Court issued an order setting Defendants’ deadline to file a motion for summary judgment on June 4, 2015. Due to the withdrawal of Plaintiff’s former 10 pro bono counsel, the Court referred the case to the Federal Pro Bono Project and granted 11 Plaintiff a four-week extension of the deadline to respond. The order also stated that the Court 12 “would also consider a reasonable motion to extend or to continue deadlines (where good cause is 13 shown) brought by new appointed pro bono counsel.” (Dkt. 91.) 14 2. On June 1, 2015, the Court appointed Ivor Samson, Bonnie Lau and Jessica 15 Duggan, all of Dentons US LLP, as pro bono counsel for Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 16 1915(e)(1) and the Court’s Federal Pro Bono Project guidelines. The Court set the briefing 17 schedule on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as follows: Defendants’ motion for 18 summary judgment due on June 4, 2015; Plaintiff’s opposition brief due on July 16, 2015; and 19 Defendants’ reply brief due on July 23, 2015. The Court scheduled the hearing on the motion for 20 summary judgment on August 13, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. (Dkt. 96.) 21 3. The Court also ordered the parties to file a joint case management statement 22 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9 no later than August 6, 2015, and scheduled a case 23 management conference on August 13, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. (Dkt. 96). 24 25 4. Defendant Bright filed a “Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment” on June 4, 2015. (Dkt. 98.) 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV13-00714 WHA (PR) -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 1 5. Good cause exists to extend the opposition and reply deadlines and hearing date 2 for Defendant Bright’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as the case 3 management statement deadline and case management conference. Ms. Lau has a Federal Circuit 4 appeal brief due on July 6 and a summary judgment motion due on July 8. Ms. Lau also has a 5 previously-scheduled work trip to Japan from July 13-24 for an investigation in another matter. 6 Ms. Duggan has a post-trial brief due on June 8 and closing arguments in that same trial on June 7 22. In addition, Ms. Duggan has previously-scheduled out-of-state family commitments from 8 July 2-9 and July 30-August 3. Counsel for Defendant Bright, Susan Kawala, has a prepaid 9 vacation from August 9-16, which conflicts with the current hearing date. 10 In light of the above facts, the parties jointly request that the Court briefly extend the 11 summary judgment and case management deadlines, and enter the following stipulation as an 12 Order of the Court: 13 A. Plaintiff shall file his opposition brief by August 17, 2015. 14 B. Defendant shall file his reply brief by August 24, 2015. 15 C. The hearing on Defendant Bright’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment 16 shall be on September 10, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. 17 D. The case management conference shall be on September 10, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. 18 E. The parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than September 3, 19 2015. 20 Dated: June 10, 2015 21 Respectfully submitted, DENTONS US LLP 22 23 BY: 24 /s/ Bonnie Lau Bonnie Lau Attorneys for Plaintiff TIO DINERO SESSOMS 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV13-00714 WHA (PR) -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 2 3 BY: 4 /s/ Susan J. Kawala Susan J. Kawala Attorneys for Defendant DARREN BRIGHT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV13-00714 WHA (PR) -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 1 PROPOSED ORDER 2 Pursuant to Stipulation and for good cause shown, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: June 15, 2015. 6 BY: Hon. William Alsup United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV13-00714 WHA (PR) -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?