Chau v. Young et al

Filing 35


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EDDIE CHAU, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 13-764 SI (pr) Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES ON DISPOSITIVE MOTION v. J. YOUNG; et al., Defendants. / 13 14 Plaintiff has filed a request for a 60-day extension of the deadline to file his opposition 15 to defendants' motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. Upon due consideration of the 16 request and plaintiff's declaration, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket # 33, #34.) The 17 court now sets the following new briefing schedule: Plaintiff must file and serve on defense 18 counsel his opposition to the motion to dismiss and for summary judgment no later than March 19 28, 2014. No further extensions of this deadline should be expected because, by the time it 20 arrives, plaintiff will have had more than five months to prepare his opposition. Defendants 21 must file and serve their reply brief (if any) no later than April 11, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2014 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?