Tarokh v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/11/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: March 11, 2013* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 16 No. C13-00804 HRL CASEY KASEM TAROKH, ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. / 17 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1, all parties were required to file, no later than March 19 7, 2013, either (1) a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a 20 Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United 21 States District Judge. Despite a written reminder from the court, not all parties have consented 22 to proceed before a magistrate judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the 23 Court shall reassign this case to a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1. 24 SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: March 11, 2013 26 HOWARD R. LLOYD 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:13-cv-00804-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Brian H. Gunn 3 Chris T Nguyen 4 Colleen Bailey Kelley 5 Joel Mark Feinstein jfeinstein@joelfeinsteinlaw.com, chris.nguyen@joelfeinsteinlaw.com, myla.perez@joelfeinsteinlaw.com, sean.webb@joelfeinsteinlaw.com bhgunn@wolfewyman.com, lcwhite@wolfewyman.com chris.nguyen@joelfeinsteinlaw.com cbkelley@wolfewyman.com, lcwhite@wolfewyman.com 6 Kathy Shakibi kshakibi@rcolegal.com 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?