Sterling et al v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 72

ORDER REGARDING REPLY BRIEF 71 . If defendants seek to file a reply that responds to the issues raised in plaintiffs' opposition, they must do so by midnight tonight. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/9/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

7
8
9
10

Case Number: 3:12-cv-00812 NC

FRANK STERLING,
Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING REPLY
BRIEF

v.

11
12
13

Dkt. No. 71
CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

The Court notes that the defendants’ reply brief, docket entry 71, appears to be a
16

duplicate of the amended motion at docket entry 67. The Court wonders if this was
17

intentional. If defendants seek to file a reply that responds to the issues raised in
18

plaintiffs’ opposition, they must do so by midnight tonight. Defendants’ motion to
19

bifurcate remains on calendar for September 10.
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
21

DATED: September 9, 2014
22

____________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:13-cv-00812 NC
ORDER REGARDING REPLY BRIEF