Faraldi v. Morss et al
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT MORSS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 9, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
DONNA L. FARALDI, Individually and as
Executrix of the Estate of MICHAEL A.
FARALDI,
15
16
17
18
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
MORSS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY
OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. C 13-853 MMC
v.
DAVID MORSS, HAROLD ANDERSON,
DRAGON AVIATION, INC., and ROBERT
DUNCAN JEFFREY,
Defendants.
/
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On April 1, 2013, defendant David Morss (“Morss”) electronically filed a motion to
dismiss. Morss has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing
Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is
electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also
Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Morss is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court’s
Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced
document. Morss is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with the Court’s
Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document, the
Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any
1
electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the
2
Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: April 9, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?