QL2 Software, LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (Private ADR Mediation): Re 18 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by QL2 Software, LLC filed by QL2 Software, LLC, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/17/2013. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Daniel Vecchio CA State Bar No. 253122 Garvey, Schubert Barer 1191 Second Ave, Suite 1800 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 464-3939 Facsimile: (206) 464-0125 Email: dvecchio@.gsblaw.com 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 QL2 Software, LLC, NO. C 13-0899 LB Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. Rearden Commerce, Inc., 14 15 16 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 17 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 18 Court Processes: o Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 19 o o 20 21 22 23 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 24 Private Process: 25 x 26 Private ADR: mediation by a third-party neutral to be mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties agree to hold the ADR Sessions by: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 1 SEA.J>OCS:1102669.i (17430.00200] o X 2 3 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) Other requested deadline: 120 days from the date the order referring the case to an ADR process is entered. 4 6/12{c7 5 Dated: 6 7 Dated: fo(r 2-1, > Signa 8 9 [pROPOSED) ORDER 10 XX (J 11 The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. o The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, 12 13 14 and IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 June 17th Dated this _ _ day of _ _-" 2013. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 By _ _ _-:-_ _ _-,--_ _ _ _ _ _ __ U.S. Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 2 SEA_DOCS:! 102669.1 [17430.00200]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?