QL2 Software, LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (Private ADR Mediation): Re 18 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by QL2 Software, LLC filed by QL2 Software, LLC, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/17/2013. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
Daniel Vecchio
CA State Bar No. 253122
Garvey, Schubert Barer
1191 Second Ave, Suite 1800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 464-3939
Facsimile: (206) 464-0125
Email: dvecchio@.gsblaw.com
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
QL2 Software, LLC,
NO. C 13-0899 LB
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
Rearden Commerce, Inc.,
14
15
16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
17
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
18
Court Processes:
o Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
19
o
o
20
21
22
23
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeed for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
24
Private Process:
25
x
26
Private ADR: mediation by a third-party neutral to be mutually agreed upon by
the parties.
The parties agree to hold the ADR Sessions by: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 1
SEA.J>OCS:1102669.i (17430.00200]
o
X
2
3
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
Other requested deadline: 120 days from the date the order referring the case to an
ADR process is entered.
4
6/12{c7
5 Dated:
6
7
Dated:
fo(r 2-1, >
Signa
8
9
[pROPOSED) ORDER
10
XX
(J
11
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
o
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows,
12
13
14
and IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
June
17th
Dated this _ _ day of _ _-" 2013.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
By _ _ _-:-_ _ _-,--_ _ _ _ _ _ __
U.S. Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 2
SEA_DOCS:! 102669.1 [17430.00200]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?